arXiv AI

TwinGridShield: Consequence-Aware Runtime Authorization for LLM Grid-Agent Actions

arXiv:2608. 15391v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-assisted energy-management tools can translate natural-language context into structured grid commands, but syntactic validity does not imply physical admissibility.

arXiv AI
Jul 21

LLMs and Agentic AI Systems for Smart Grids: A Tutorial on Architectures and Applications

arXiv:2607. 18147v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI systems have evolved from natural language tasks to using external tools to plan, retrieve, and act in technical domains.

By Daniela Rojas, Abdulwahab Albassam, Aidan G. Leung, Jett Ngo, Ryan Luo, Peter R. Quawas, Junpyung Kim, Kangkai Liang, Mansi Nanavati, Jonathan Mai, Meng-Chi Tsai, Yun-Tong Tsai, Yize Chen, Yuanyuan Shi
arXiv AI
Aug 19

PACE: Policy-Attested Contract Execution for Safe AI Agents in Decentralized Finance

The paper introduces PACE (Policy‑Attested Contract Execution), a framework that sits between large‑language‑model (LLM) based autonomous AI agents and on‑chain DeFi operations. PACE defines typed transaction intents, a deterministic policy verifier, and signed Policy Decision Records (PDRs) that cryptographically bind an approved intent, policy, and simulation report to the exact on‑chain execution bytes, providing replay and expiration protection. In evaluations across 40 tasks and six baselines, PACE achieves zero unsafe executions and zero false positives, outperforming unguarded agents by a large margin.

By Rabimba Karanjai (Larry), Yang Lu (Larry), Richard Williamson (Larry), Hemanth Hm (Larry), Prakhar Mehrotra (Larry), Lei Xu (Larry), Weidong (Larry), Shi
arXiv AI
Aug 28

PLCBench: Can Autonomous LLM Agents Turn PLC Access into Sustained Physical Impact?

PLCBench is a hardware‑in‑the‑loop framework that evaluates whether autonomous large language model agents can transform network‑reachable programmable logic controllers (PLCs) into sustained physical threats. It integrates vendor‑native PLC interaction, commercial PLC execution, closed‑loop process simulation, and deterministic diagnostics to classify episodes into usable interaction, process‑linked manipulation, and sustained physical impact. Across 240 real‑PLC episodes with five LLM families, 31.3% achieved sustained physical objectives, revealing that richer process observation improves success rates and pinpointing failure points for future defense research.

By Yitian Zhou, Jingyu Zheng, Qiliang Jiang, Linkang Du, Haoming Liu, Lichao Wu, Shiyi Zhao, Mengxiang Liu, Ruilong Deng
arXiv AI
6d ago

Grid-Orch: An LLM-Powered Orchestrator for Distribution Grid Simulation and Analytics

Grid‑Orch is a framework that connects Large Language Models (LLMs) to power system simulation via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), allowing engineers to conduct complex distribution grid analyses using natural language. It offers 36 domain‑specific tools across eleven categories—including power flow, voltage analysis, quasi‑static time‑series simulation, and automated optimization—implemented with OpenDSS as the reference engine. The platform supports both cloud‑hosted and locally deployed LLMs, enabling air‑gapped operation, and demonstrates that tasks such as DER interconnection screening can be completed in under two minutes with results identical to traditional scripting.

By Boming Liu, Jin Dong, Jianming Lian
arXiv AI
Sep 17

Autonomy in Check: Governor-Mediated Adaptive Security at the Edge

The paper proposes a split‑control architecture for adaptive security at the network edge, where an untrusted planner emits typed security intents that are vetted by a deterministic governor before being enacted. The governor checks each intent against safety, resource, temporal‑stability, and proportionality invariants, issuing signed receipts for admitted actions that are compiled into eBPF map updates. Experiments on a Raspberry Pi 5 connected to a university 5G test network show the governor can admit, reject, and bound intents at microsecond cost without disrupting protected‑flow regularity.

By Ijaz Ahmad, Ijaz Ahmad, Flavio Esposito, Erkki Harjula