arXiv:2608. 04054v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal intent recognition requires understanding not only what textual, acoustic, and visual signals share, but also how they disagree.
arXiv:2607. 16076v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal sarcasm and cyberbullying detection remain challenging because the intended meaning often emerges from incongruity between textual and visual information rather than from either modality alone.
arXiv:2608. 19942v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal sarcasm detection aims to identify sarcastic intent from multimodal content, where inconsistencies between literal meaning and contextual cues often signal irony.
Multimodal sarcasm detection aims to identify sarcastic intent from multimodal content, where inconsistencies between literal meaning and contextual cues often signal irony. This task has attracted increasing research attention.
arXiv:2607. 24191v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conversational stance detection has shifted from static text analysis to dynamic multimodal modeling.
The paper introduces ContraTalk, a benchmark that tests whether dialogue models truly use acoustic cues or rely on transcript shortcuts. It formalizes cross‑modal disagreement, creates conflict and consistent QA examples, and proposes an Audio Twin representation to expose acoustic evidence to models. Experiments show that while text‑only LLMs perform well on consistent cases, they falter on conflict cases, and AudioLLMs only partially mitigate this issue.
arXiv:2606. 03066v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid rise of generative AI has made multimodal fake news increasingly realistic and pervasive, posing severe threats to public trust and social stability.
BiCFlow-MER introduces a conditional-flow framework for audio-text multimodal emotion recognition, treating the task as generative evidence transport within a structured emotion space. It disentangles emotion-oriented evidence from speaker style and lexical content, creating a conflict-aware affective condition that guides bidirectional rectified flow to an explicit emotion-space endpoint. The model verifies candidate emotions via adaptive prototype-cloud scoring and backward class-to-condition consistency, achieving superior performance on IEMOCAP, MELD, and the zero-shot CASE benchmark.
arXiv:2609.38182v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Avatar-based multimodal empathetic response generation has emerged as a pivotal capability in human-centric systems, aiming to recognize user emotion...
In multimodal emotion recognition (MER), human affective states are inferred by integrating complementary cues from multiple modalities. In audio-text MER, affective cues are often entangled with spea...
arXiv:2608.30726v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) is a fundamental component of affective computing that aims to decipher complex emotional states by integrating ver...
arXiv:2606. 08081v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Repeated reference games test whether interlocutors replace their initially long descriptions with shorter, partner-specific conventions grounded in shared interaction history.
arXiv:2608. 07867v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal emotion recognition often treats self-reported labels as reliable supervision while overlooking self-report unreliability and cross-modal conflict.