Design-Based Supervised Learning with Noisy Human Labels
arXiv:2607. 15455v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers increasingly use automated classifiers to label unstructured data for statistical analysis.
arXiv:2403. 07008v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The evaluation of machine learning models using human-labeled validation data can be expensive and time-consuming.
arXiv:2607. 15455v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers increasingly use automated classifiers to label unstructured data for statistical analysis.
arXiv:2606. 25996v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce Autodata, a general method that enables AI agents to act as data scientists who build high quality training and evaluation data.
arXiv:2606. 08718v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Deep Active Learning (DAL) effectively reduces human annotation costs, its efficacy is constrained by human annotation errors.
arXiv:2604. 14575v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models enable inexpensive AI-generated annotations, but using them reliably for causal inference remains challenging.
arXiv:2605. 23595v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of machine learning has led to an unprecedented expansion of model ecosystems, making it increasingly difficult to assess the reliability of newly released models on unseen and unlabeled data.
In a world where human time is expensive, learn how to use it only when really necessary The post Reducing Human Annotation with ML Active Learning appeared first on Towards Data Science .
arXiv:2606. 13629v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: There is a proliferation of work arguing for the use of synthetic data in scientific research.
We’ve fine-tuned the 774M parameter GPT-2 language model using human feedback for various tasks, successfully matching the preferences of the external human labelers, though those preferences did not always match our own. Specifically, for summarization tasks the labelers preferred sentences copied wholesale from the input (we’d only asked them to ensure accuracy), so our models learned to copy.
arXiv:2603. 09692v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become the standard for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs), yet its efficacy is bottlenecked by the high cost of acquiring preference data, especially in low-resource and expert domains.
arXiv:2607. 07469v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for e-commerce attribute extraction requires labeled data representative across thousands of product types, attributes, and multiple languages.
arXiv:2608. 03437v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While human evaluation is the gold standard in many NLP tasks, it suffers from prohibitive costs and poor scalability.
arXiv:2607. 20455v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human-annotated data remains fundamental to training frontier Large Language Models (LLMs).