arXiv:2508. 09219v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in AI applications have raised growing concerns about the need for ethical guidelines and regulations to mitigate the risks posed by these technologies.
By Wilder Baldwin, Sepideh Ghanavati, Manuel Woersdoerfer
arXiv:2606. 13739v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper examines trade-offs between AI safety and well-being relative to (i) one of the most promising methods for finetuning super-capable AIs, 'Constitutional AI', and (ii) one of the most influential approaches to understanding complex ethical decision making and the conditions for the well-being of rational agents, 'Virtue Ethics'.
By Guillermo Del Pinal, Youngchan Lee, Min Ohn
arXiv:2607. 20461v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Present implementations of artificial intelligence (AI) ethics do not adequately take feelings, or affect, into account.
By Jonny O'Dwyer, Malika Bendechache, Louise McCormack, Elif Calik, Ramin Ranjbarzadeh, Dost Muhammad, Shokofeh Anari Bozcheloei, Ishita Singh
arXiv:2606. 09475v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Work on `emergent misalignment' shows that finetuning LLMs on narrow tasks can induce broadly misaligned behavior.
By Guillermo Del Pinal, Youngchan Lee, Cameron McNamara, Alejandro Perez Carballo
arXiv:2606. 15485v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic AI systems act autonomously, use tools, adapt to context, and operate in complex real-world environments.
By Hao-Ping Lee, Jessica He, David Piorkowski, Thomas Serban von Davier, Jodi Forlizzi, Sauvik Das
arXiv:2607. 12755v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-enabled systems are seeing increasing deployment across numerous domains, with many being "black boxes" with respect to core functions and capabilities.
By Nathan G. Wood, Andrew P. Rebera
AI-enabled systems are seeing increasing deployment across numerous domains, with many being "black boxes" with respect to core functions and capabilities. I.
arXiv:2604. 24155v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The project of aligning machine behavior with human values raises a basic problem: whose moral expectations should guide AI decision-making?
By Benjamin Minhao Chen, Xinyu Xie
arXiv:2607. 20255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-driven autonomous agents are reshaping offensive security.
By Andreas Happe, J\"urgen Cito, Jasmin Wachter
arXiv:2606. 04321v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic AI deployments face a recurring design tension: heavy human oversight limits scale, while broad autonomy outruns accountability.
By Travis Weber, Rohit Taneja
Large language models (LLMs) have become significant providers of mental health support, yet they remain products of an attention economy whose operational and commercial targets favour sustained engagement over the friction that effective psychological support often requires. Developers' safety responses have been largely reactive, addressing the most visible and acute harms while subtler, longer-term patterns of risk (e.
arXiv:2606. 11218v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ethical deliberation is often misunderstood as a search for single right or wrong answers, creating difficulties for non-ethically trained personnel who must address ethically laden challenges.
By Stephen Milford, B. Zara Malgir, Miguel Vazquez