arXiv AI
Aug 7
EcoAgent-Bench: Evaluating Economic Decision-Making in Budget-Constrained LLM Agents
arXiv:2608. 05519v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent benchmarks usually measure task completion and treat resource use as an auxiliary statistic.
How Many Tasks Are Enough for Agent Benchmark Decisions? A Replay Analysis of Public LLM Agent Benchmarks
arXiv:2607. 12338v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent benchmarks often compare two agents after all tasks have run, but costly evaluations make partial runs tempting.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 2
Are Performance-Optimization Benchmarks Reliably Measuring Coding Agents?
arXiv:2607. 01211v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Repository-level performance-optimization benchmarks such as GSO, SWE-Perf and SWE-fficiency evaluate coding agents by applying patches to real repositories and comparing runtime against unoptimized baselines and official reference patches.
arXiv AI
Aug 10
"LLM Agent Performance" Is Not a Single Evaluation Target
arXiv:2602. 03238v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM agent benchmark scores are shaped not only by the model but also by the agent harness, environment, evaluator, and inference budget.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 10
DeepSWE: Measuring Frontier Coding Agents on Original, Long-Horizon Engineering Tasks
arXiv:2607. 07946v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: DeepSWE is a benchmark of 113 original, long-horizon software engineering tasks for evaluating coding agents.
arXiv AI
Jul 3
PACE: A Proxy for Agentic Capability Evaluation
arXiv:2607. 02032v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating LLM agents on benchmarks like SWE-Bench and GAIA can be expensive, time-consuming, and requires complex infrastructure.
arXiv AI
Aug 10
From Plan to Action: How Well Do Agents Follow the Plan?
arXiv:2604. 12147v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Agents are commonly instructed to follow a task-specific plan for guidance.
arXiv AI
Jul 9
AgentLens: Production-Assessed Trajectory Reviews for Coding Agent Evaluation
arXiv:2607. 06624v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present AgentLens, a production-assessed benchmark for interactive code agents.
arXiv AI
Jun 9
SWE-Marathon: Can Agents Autonomously Complete Ultra-Long-Horizon Software Work?
arXiv:2606. 07682v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI agents are increasingly expected to complete long-horizon workflows that require sustained progress over hours, millions of tokens, and complex environments.
arXiv AI
Jul 1
An Executable Benchmarking Suite for Tool-Using Agents
arXiv:2605. 11030v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Closed-loop tool-using agents are increasingly evaluated in executable web, code, and micro-task environments, but benchmark reports often conflate workloads, action-generating drivers, and the evidence admitted for systems-facing claims.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 31
ClawTrack: Towards Trace-Level Evaluation and Improvement of Real-World Autonomous Agents
arXiv:2607. 28037v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As LLM-based agents are deployed in complex, multi-step workflows, a critical evaluation gap has emerged: most existing benchmarks judge only final outcomes, unable to distinguish reliable reasoning from lucky success or attribute failures to specific process deficiencies, hindering attribution in long-horizon tasks.
arXiv AI
Jul 15
Do AI Agents Know When a Task Is Simple? Toward Complexity-Aware Reasoning and Execution
arXiv:2607. 13034v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate multi-step engineering and informatics workflows, yet they rarely ask how much effort a task actually requires.
arXiv AI
Aug 7
SkillTV-Bench: Benchmarking How Well Judges Perform on Skill-Augmented Agentic Execution
arXiv:2608. 05573v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly execute long-horizon tasks through tool use and environment interaction, shifting evaluation from final-response scoring to verification of complete executions.