arXiv:2607. 05844v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent systems accumulate conflicting observations across branches, retries, and replicas, yet many practical memory layers still collapse disagreement behind overwrite rules that are difficult to inspect or correct.
By Sergey Volkov, Yang Li, Ye Luo
arXiv:2608. 13921v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly maintain personal memory across sessions, but it can conflict.
By Lu Yang, Shusheng Xu, Zhuoran Li, Tongkai Yang, Longbo Huang
arXiv:2607. 16211v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents augmented with persistent memory can recall past interactions, but existing systems suffer from two limitations: flat, unstructured storage loses relational context needed for multi-hop and temporal reasoning, and reliance on expensive LLM-based classification makes them impractical for latency-sensitive deployment.
By Zicheng Zhao, Xinyang Guo, Luyao Lv, Menghan Wang, Ming Li, Shuaicheng Li
LLM agents increasingly maintain personal memory across sessions, but it can conflict. Preferences depend on context, behavior evolves, and sources can conflict. When a query lacks context, time, or s...
Memory has emerged as a cornerstone of modern LLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators. However, memory is not always beneficial: retrieved memories often induce a critical issue of sycophancy, causing agents to over-align with the user at the cost of factual accuracy or objective reasoning.
arXiv:2609.09115v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long horizon Large Language Model (LLM) agents rely on external memory systems to preserve user preferences and task knowledge across extended interact...
By Boyu Yang, Jiazheng Sun, Zilong Lu, Zhi Qiu, Xin Peng, Jun Zheng
The paper introduces MERIT, a benchmark that evaluates the marginal benefit of long‑term memory for tool‑using large language model agents while explicitly accounting for cost. MERIT provides episodic tool‑use tasks across three domains, verifies dependence on earlier‑episode facts, and measures memory operations in tokens and dollars. Experiments on GPT‑4.1‑mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, and Claude Sonnet 5 show that memory can significantly improve task success, but its utility varies widely across models and memory implementations, and full replay is rarely cost‑effective.
By Shweta Mishra, Shashank Mishra
Mnemon is a memory agent that stores conversations as raw, dated records and uses a fast System 1 decision model (Jev) to quickly judge the relevance of records, while a slow System 2 LLM plans searches and composes answers. The agent consolidates records into topic timelines and value histories in the background, enabling efficient retrieval without rewriting conversations into structured formats. Experiments show Mnemon achieving high scores on LoCoMo and LongMemEval‑S with low context length and cost, and Jev outperforming LLMs in evidence separation and speed.
By Guangren Wang
arXiv:2607. 01071v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memory has emerged as a cornerstone of modern LLM-based agents, supporting their evolution from single-turn assistants to long-term collaborators.
By Zhishang Xiang, Zerui Chen, Yunbo Tang, Zhimin Wei, Ruqin Ning, Yujie Lin, Qinggang Zhang, Jinsong Su
arXiv:2609.21533v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: LLM-based multi-agent systems generate collaboration traces that record how agents plan tasks, verify intermediate results, and repair failures. Reusin...
By Kairui Yang, Minghao An, Xunkai Li, Ziheng Yi, Zekai Chen, Guangyuan He, Rong-Hua Li
Self-Evolving Multimedia Verification through Memory Consolidation of Contestation Experiences (SEMV) is a multi-agent framework that uses provenance-bearing arguments to link evidence, reasoning, human contestation, and memory. It integrates arena-based quantitative bipolar argumentation, causal and scoped revision, and verification-gated memory consolidation with explicit conflict retention. On the COSMOS benchmark, SEMV achieves 91.88% accuracy, reducing negative transfer from 5.7% to 0.2%, and on the CTR benchmark it corrects 96.7% of initial errors while saving 52.8% of compute.
By Truong Thanh Hung Nguyen, Vo Thanh Khang Nguyen, Hoang-Loc Cao, Phuc Ho, Truong Thinh Nguyen, Van Pham, Hung Cao
arXiv:2508. 01273v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Explicit knowledge conflicts, occurring when retrieved contexts contain contradictory information, pose a fundamental challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs) as they integrate increasingly diverse data sources.
By Xianda Zheng, Zijian Huang, Meng-Fen Chiang, Jiamou Liu, Yuan Fang, Michael Witbrock, Kaiqi Zhao