arXiv:2606. 03523v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Early attribution of Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) activity can help defenders prioritise investigation, select countermeasures, and reduce the impact of an intrusion.
arXiv:2608. 19901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agent Skills extend LLM agents with reusable instruction packages that may also include scripts, resources, and service configuration.
arXiv:2503.11841v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) malware detectors rely heavily on crowd-sourced AntiVirus (AV) labels, with platforms like VirusTotal serving as truste...
The paper presents a lightweight machine‑learning approach for multi‑class malware detection on resource‑constrained devices. Using a LightGBM classifier with SMOTE oversampling, SOM‑US undersampling, and Genetic‑Algorithm feature selection, the authors achieve 89.1 % accuracy on four malware families and 76 % on 16 individual malware types. A second Random‑Forest model further improves family classification to 91.2 % and individual classification to 78.7 %.
The study evaluates pseudo‑labeling for semi‑supervised learning on Android malware attribution using six classifiers. Results show that the benefit of SSL varies strongly by classifier: SVM gains the most, LightGBM improves modestly, and Random Forest can be harmed at low label ratios. The approach particularly helps hard‑to‑classify families and achieves near‑optimal performance with about 800 labeled samples.
arXiv:2609.14593v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Living-Off-the-Land (LOTL) is the dominant evasion technique of Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) actors, exploiting legitimate Windows utilities to c...
arXiv:2507. 18313v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Malware evolves rapidly, forcing machine learning-based detectors to be continuously updated.
arXiv:2602. 14161v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Detecting prompt injection, jailbreak attacks, and harmful requests is critical for deploying LLM-based agents safely, yet current evaluation practices in this literature overestimate generalization.
The paper evaluates three AI model security scanners—ModelScan, ModelAudit, and Fickling—using a benchmark of 170 Pickle and PyTorch artifacts from 145 families, 135 of which have binary security labels. It distinguishes coverage metrics such as non‑N/A coverage, analysis completion, and definitive security decisions, finding that ModelAudit achieved 100% definitive decisions, Fickling 81.5%, and ModelScan 49.6%. When a definitive judgment was made, ModelScan reached perfect precision, recall, and F1, while Fickling added no unique true positives beyond those found by the other tools.
arXiv:2606. 30572v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Malware classification remains a challenging problem due to its inherent heterogeneity, the presence of packed binaries, and the diverse distribution of malware families.
The paper evaluates two training‑time data poisoning attacks—label flipping and backdoor poisoning—on MNIST and Fashion‑MNIST using Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest classifiers. Label flipping degrades performance most for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest remains relatively stable. Backdoor poisoning achieves near‑perfect attack success rates across all models while largely preserving clean‑test accuracy, highlighting the stealthy nature of targeted backdoors.
arXiv:2509. 14335v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automated malware classifiers achieve strong detection performance, but auditing requires more than flagging a sample: analysts must explain malicious behaviors and justify them with code evidence.
arXiv:2609.21303v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Product abuse is an individually rare, but growing, problem across the SaaS industry. Highly sophisticated threat actors can misuse security platform...