arXiv:2607. 19914v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study finite-horizon MDP planning under \emph{root-based} (resolute) risk objectives that apply a rank-dependent functional to the distribution of total returns.
By Irmaan (Mohammad), Mirzanejad, Nadjet Bourdache, Abdel-Illah Mouaddib
arXiv:2608. 09335v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multistage stochastic model predictive control (MPC) handles uncertainty by optimizing over a scenario tree, a finite branching approximation of future outcomes constructed from sampled forecasts.
By Fabio Pavirani, Bert Claessens, Pierre Pinson, Chris Develder
The paper introduces a robust variant of Monte Carlo Tree Search that addresses ambiguities in transition dynamics and reward distributions, bridging the gap between simulation-based planning and real-world deployment. It incorporates a robust power mean backup operator and exploration bonuses to guarantee finite-sample convergence at every node, achieving an ≠O(n−1/2) convergence rate for root value estimation comparable to standard MCTS. Empirical results demonstrate robust performance in planning tasks even under significant model mismatches.
By Tuan Dam, Kishan Panaganti, Brahim Driss, Adam Wierman
Multistage stochastic model predictive control (MPC) handles uncertainty by optimizing over a scenario tree, a finite branching approximation of future outcomes constructed from sampled forecasts. To build such a tree, conventional methods focus on matching the underlying probability distribution---e.
arXiv:2609.06489v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) has demonstrated success in online planning for deterministic environments, yet significant challenges remain in adapt...
By Tuan Dam
arXiv:2606. 27766v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning enables policy learning from fixed datasets without additional environment interaction, making it appealing for safety-critical applications where online exploration is costly or unsafe.
By Shiqiang Gong
Sequential decision-making in real-world applications often involves uncertainty about the environment's model. Uncertain Markov decision processes (UMDPs) represent the possible environments as a set of MDPs with shared states and actions but potentially different transition probabilities and rewards.
arXiv:2602. 17375v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We formulate episodic Markov decision process (MDP) planning as Bayesian inference over policies.
By David Tolpin
arXiv:2608. 01133v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) policies in autonomous driving fundamentally relies on extrinsic statistical indicators (e.
By Ye Han, Lijun Zhang, Dejian Meng
arXiv:2608. 02509v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sequential decision-making in real-world applications often involves uncertainty about the environment's model.
By Sterre Lutz, Dani\"el Vos, Matthijs T. J. Spaan, Anna Lukina
The paper introduces a framework for optimal policy improvement in reinforcement learning, defining it as the best single update under given constraints. It shows that restricting improvement to a subset of states is equivalent to solving an induced Markov Decision Process, linking planning with explicit or implicit models to optimal policy improvement. The authors develop a novel operator for greedification under approximate evaluation, demonstrating empirical gains across several RL algorithms and settings.
By Yaniv Oren, Viliam Vadocz, Wiktor Zabka, Thomas Evers, Jan Robine, Wendelin B\"ohmer, Matthijs T. J. Spaan, Martha White, Hendrik Baier, Fenghui Yu
The paper introduces a new approach to safety in contextual bandits with continuous actions by enforcing high‑probability constraints on the realized cost rather than on its expectation. It proposes the High‑Probability Constrained UCB algorithm, which balances optimistic reward exploration with pessimistic safety estimation. The authors provide theoretical regret guarantees for linear models and extend the analysis to general function classes, demonstrating experimentally that realized‑cost constraints significantly reduce safety violations compared to expected‑cost baselines.