The paper investigates online linear regression with sparse comparators, focusing on feature priming techniques that reweight features using past data. It establishes sparse‑regret lower bounds that invalidate sparse‑logarithmic guarantees for univariate, Pearson, and multivariate priming rules under a past‑only Moore–Penrose protocol, showing ≥Ω(min{T,√d}) clipped regret for unit‑power rules and linear regret for powered rules in high dimensions. The authors also provide tight rank upper bounds for certain priming schemes and present algebraic constructions yielding Ω(min{T,d^{1/4}}) regret for unit‑power multivariate priming, while noting that the exact multivariate frontier remains open.
By Huibo Xu, Shi Fu, Qixin Zhang, Dacheng Tao
The paper studies high‑dimensional linear contextual bandits with knapsack constraints (CBwK), aiming to exploit sparsity for tighter regret bounds. It introduces an online hard‑thresholding estimator integrated into a primal‑dual framework, achieving sub‑linear regret that grows only logarithmically with the feature dimension. Under either a diverse‑covariate or margin condition, the regret improves to τ‑dependent rates, and when both hold simultaneously, a dual resolving scheme yields an even tighter bound. The approach also recovers optimal rates for high‑dimensional contextual bandits without knapsacks, and experiments demonstrate its practical effectiveness.
By Wanteng Ma, Dong Xia, Jiashuo Jiang
In federated averaging, local objectives can admit multiple optimal heads, making the aggregate depend on which heads clients return. We study this ambiguity in federated multivariate regression with...
arXiv:2609.39464v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In federated averaging, local objectives can admit multiple optimal heads, making the aggregate depend on which heads clients return. We study this amb...
By Chuang Ma, Tomoyuki Obuchi
arXiv:2602. 23116v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We consider the problem of regularized best-response max-regret minimization in online RLHF under general preferences and bandit feedback.
By Junghyun Lee, Minju Hong, Kwang-Sung Jun, Chulhee Yun, Se-Young Yun
arXiv:2309. 15769v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in deep learning have highlighted the phenomenon of benign overfitting in overparameterized statistical models, sparking significant interest in understanding its foundations.
By Dennis Shen, Dogyoon Song, Peng Ding, Jasjeet S. Sekhon
arXiv:2606. 08365v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse autoencoder (SAE) features are increasingly used to steer language models, but feature steering is rarely clean: the same intervention can behave inconsistently across contexts and perturb unrelated features.
By Evan Duan
arXiv:2504. 17768v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Sparse attention offers a promising strategy to extend long-context capabilities in Transformer LLMs, yet its efficiency-accuracy trade-offs remain unclear due to the lack of comprehensive evaluation.
By Piotr Nawrot, Robert Li, Renjie Huang, Sebastian Ruder, Kelly Marchisio, Edoardo M. Ponti
arXiv:2603. 12977v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Foundation models are commonly deployed as frozen feature extractors with a small trainable head to adapt to private, user-generated data in federated settings.
By Yijun Quan, Wentai Wu, Giovanni Montana
arXiv:2507. 11768v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Bayesian accounts of in-context learning face a direct objection: exact posterior predictives for exchangeable data are invariant to task-preserving order, yet transformers change next-token probabilities when the same examples are serialized differently.
By Leon Chlon, Fatima Sheaib, Zein Khamis, Maggie Chlon, Mahdi El Zein, MarcAntonio M. Awada
arXiv:2609.23937v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Robust linear fits can resist response contamination yet remain too dense or unstable for useful global explanations. We propose penalized distillati...
By Wooyoung Shin, Seunghwan Park
arXiv:2607. 05806v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training data for machine learning is routinely collected by a selection process the model never sees: loans are observed only when granted, outcomes only when a test was ordered.
By Gunner Levi Howe