GRACE is a step‑level benchmark for evaluating the faithfulness of chain‑of‑thought reasoning over context. It provides human annotations for each step in CoT traces from 10 models across 4 datasets, labeling faithfulness, error category, and natural‑language explanations. The benchmark introduces a data‑driven taxonomy that splits errors into GRACE‑Inference (deductive) and GRACE‑Grounding (factual) tracks, each with four categories, and demonstrates that incorporating step‑level faithfulness signals can improve downstream accuracy and reasoning reliability.
By Hoang Pham, Dong Le, Anh Tuan Luu
The paper introduces MCircKE, a mechanistic circuit-based knowledge editing framework for large language models. MCircKE identifies the causal circuits involved in a specific reasoning task and surgically updates parameters only within those circuits, thereby addressing the reasoning gap where edited facts are not used in multi-step reasoning. Experiments on the MQuAKE-series benchmarks show that this approach improves multi-hop reasoning performance after knowledge editing.
By Tianyi Zhao, Yinhan He, Wendy Zheng, Chen Chen
arXiv:2606. 17524v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models show strong reasoning ability, but their internal reasoning process can remain unstable in complex multi-step settings, where early hidden-state errors may propagate to incorrect predictions.
By Chia-Hsuan Hsu, Jui-Ming Yao
arXiv:2505.16782v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on complex tasks through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. However, conventional CoT...
By Xinghao Chen, Anhao Zhao, Heming Xia, Xuan Lu, Hanlin Wang, Yanjun Chen, Wei Zhang, Jian Wang, Wenjie Li, Xiaoyu Shen
Reasoning Language Models (RLMs) have significantly improved performance on complex tasks by extending the reasoning chain. However, these chains are prone to containing factual errors, particularly in knowledge-intensive tasks.
arXiv:2602. 02416v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Self-correction in language models remains elusive.
By Ankur Samanta, Akshayaa Magesh, Ayush Jain, Kavosh Asadi, Youliang Yu, Daniel Jiang, Boris Vidolov, Kaveh Hassani, Paul Sajda, Jalaj Bhandari, Yonathan Efroni
arXiv:2601. 22642v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable capabilities, yet their stochastic next-token prediction creates logical inconsistencies and reward hacking that formal symbolic systems avoid.
By Chuxue Cao, Jinluan Yang, Haoran Li, Kunhao Pan, Zijian Zhao, Zhengyu Chen, Yuchen Tian, Lijun Wu, Conghui He, Sirui Han, Yike Guo
arXiv:2608. 05168v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models often fail on reasoning tasks despite possessing the capability to solve them.
By Dayu Wang, Jiaye Yang, Weikang Li, Jiahui Liang, Yang Li, Deguo Xia, Jizhou Huang
arXiv:2607. 21306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as tutors and thought partners, helping users reason through problems.
By Verona Teo, Raghav Jain, Tobias Gerstenberg, Max Kleiman-Weiner
arXiv:2604. 22565v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) can reason well, yet often miss decisive evidence when it is buried in long, noisy contexts.
By Shaoang Li, Yanhang Shi, Yufei Li, Mingfu Liang, Xiaohan Wei, Yunchen Pu, Fei Tian, Chonglin Sun, Frank Shyu, Luke Simon, Sandeep Pandey, Xi Liu, Jian Li
arXiv:2601. 03093v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent work on activation and latent steering has demonstrated that modifying internal representations can effectively guide large language models (LLMs) toward improved reasoning and efficiency without updating model parameters.
By Tuc Nguyen, Thai Le
arXiv:2608.30426v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Current dialogue systems struggle with dynamic information retrieval, often leading to hallucinations and lower response accuracy. We address this by a...
By Markel Ferro, Oier Lopez de Lacalle