arXiv:2607. 27995v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adversarial training has emerged as a powerful approach for protecting models against adversarial attacks in a broad range of real-world applications.
arXiv:2607. 27995v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Adversarial training can improve the robustness of predictive models to bounded perturbations, often at the cost of statistical efficiency.
arXiv:2510. 18989v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators are commonly utilized as fast surrogates for numerical solvers in PDE problems, mapping input functions to solution functions.
arXiv:2607. 03075v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety-critical applications require classifiers that are both robust and reliable.
arXiv:2607. 04145v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adversarial attacks guide and provide additional training and test data for both adversarial training and adversarial robustness validation, and expose the 'piecewise linearity' of deep learning based models.
arXiv:2211. 14966v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) are highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks.
arXiv:2606. 31653v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Certified training aims to produce models whose predictions can be formally verified against adversarial perturbations, typically by optimising upper bounds on the worst-case loss over an allowed perturbation set.
The paper introduces probabilistic adversarial training, a method that enhances robustness by reducing the overlap between a distance-based distribution and a victim-classifier-induced distribution. It derives a KL-based lower bound on probabilistic robustness, which serves as a tractable surrogate objective. Experiments confirm that this approach consistently improves probabilistic robustness and can even boost non-probabilistic adversarial training methods through an induced scaling factor.
The paper introduces Inverse Knowledge Distillation (IKD), an attack‑agnostic technique that enhances adversarial transferability by maximizing the discrepancy between benign and adversarial prediction distributions on a surrogate model. IKD employs a CE/KL‑equivalent soft‑label objective to push adversarial predictions away from a fixed benign anchor, leveraging Fisher‑sensitive surrogate directions. The authors provide theoretical analysis showing CE and KL induce identical gradients, derive a lower bound on Fisher‑subspace overlap, and demonstrate through extensive ImageNet experiments that IKD consistently improves black‑box attack performance across CNN, ViT, and defended models.
arXiv:2606. 01746v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern neural networks are highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations.
arXiv:2410. 07719v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite being widely adopted as a canonical framework for learning robust models, adversarial training suffers from robust overfitting.
arXiv:2606. 27784v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The existence of adversarial attacks is often attributed to the presence of non-robust features in neural networks.
arXiv:2606. 02267v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The vulnerability of deep neural networks to adversarial examples poses a significant challenge for real-world deployment.