arXiv:2607. 08960v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Warehouse operations are governed by Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that encode complex, multi-system decision logic, which must be executed reliably under strict time constraints, yet LLM agents lack mechanisms to enforce procedural compliance and degrade under the context overload full SOP specifications introduce.
arXiv:2609.05774v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent multi-agent LLM systems increasingly rely on graph-structured communication to coordinate specialized agents. We revisit multi-agent orchestrati...
arXiv:2607. 08010v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Production LLM agents often waste latency and reliability by regenerating code for the same procedural steps on every request.
arXiv:2608. 13900v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are evolving from conversational assistants into autonomous systems that execute long-horizon tasks through reasoning, tool use, code generation, and workspace manipulation.
arXiv:2606. 01533v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Computer use agents (CUAs) today are primarily deployed as single serial agents.
arXiv:2609.06128v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Production LLM agents execute tool-calling loops, retrieval chains, and compositional workflows in multiple modes, yet execution semantics are often co...
Production LLM agents often waste latency and reliability by regenerating code for the same procedural steps on every request. We replace this inference-time coding loop with an agentic tool-making pipeline that compiles repeated SOP steps into validated, versioned tools before deployment.
The paper argues that the architecture of multi‑agent large language model (LLM) frameworks, rather than just the intelligence of the underlying models, largely determines system performance. It introduces a taxonomy of architectural dimensions—such as orchestration, memory, planning interfaces, specialization, and communication topology—and presents MAFBench, a unified evaluation suite. An empirical study across nine frameworks, keeping the LLM constant, reveals six design principles and shows that choices like orchestration and communication topology can dramatically affect latency, accuracy, and coordination success.
arXiv:2605. 18421v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents mainly evaluate reasoning, planning, and execution.
arXiv:2608. 14380v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many real-world tasks require LLM agents to interact with their environments over long execution horizons.
The paper introduces Env‑Rethink, a 27B post‑trained model system designed to help large language model agents better interact with complex, evolving environments. It builds Collection Maps and Event Logs to organize scattered information, uses offline trajectory learning to detect noise, and generates virtual event histories to evolve environments for more challenging tasks. Experiments show that Env‑Rethink improves downstream task performance by over 15.1% rubric pass rate across nine models on 30 tasks.
The paper introduces the Procedural Graph, a framework that structures procedural knowledge into (procedure, relation, procedure) triplets to guide large language model agents in planning and tool usage. At each decision point, a guidance model uses the local subgraph to bias the agent’s next action, while an LLM refiner self‑evolves the graph by editing its topology based on successful versus failed trajectories. Experiments across datasets and LLMs show that Procedural Graphs consistently outperform memory‑based baselines, and the self‑evolution mechanism further improves performance without manual engineering.
arXiv:2606. 06090v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents increasingly tackle long-horizon tasks with interdependent decisions, where each action reshapes future constraints and intermediate errors can cascade.