arXiv:2608. 02826v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning is a subfield of machine learning that studies how an agent interacts with an environment in order to extract as large a reward as possible.
By Joao F. Doriguello
arXiv:2507. 22854v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose novel classical and quantum online algorithms for learning finite- and infinite-horizon Markov Decision Processes (MDPs).
By Andris Ambainis, Joao F. Doriguello, Debbie Lim
arXiv:2606. 08276v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum reinforcement learning (QRL) is a promising approach to learn effective decision strategies across several applications with stochastic environments.
By Alexander DeRieux, Walid Saad
The paper investigates whether quantum reinforcement learning algorithms can be matched by efficient classical methods. It focuses on a simplified reinforcement learning setting with a uniform generative model, providing finite‑sample guarantees for classical kernelized Fitted Q‑Iteration that uses kernels aligned with parameterized quantum circuits. The authors identify sufficient conditions on data encoding, kernel choice, and problem structure under which this classical approach dequantizes quantum Q‑learning, and suggest using kernelized Fitted Q‑Iteration as a heuristic when those conditions cannot be verified.
By Pablo Rodriguez-Grasa, Sofiene Jerbi, Mikel Sanz, Ryan Sweke
Adaptive Hamiltonian learning is central to calibrating and characterizing quantum devices. In an adaptive controller, choosing the next experiment is itself a computation.
arXiv:2509. 08654v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Quantum network routing requires online decisions under probabilistic entanglement generation, finite quantum memories, decoherence, imperfect operations, and classical feedback, while the controller has incomplete knowledge of the physical state.
By Amirhossein Taherpour, Abbas Taherpour, Tamer Khattab, Mazen Hasna
arXiv:2607. 29491v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement-learning-based quantum architecture search (RL-QAS) repeatedly optimizes a variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) after extending a circuit, although circuit construction and action legality are deterministic and known.
By Jiayang Niu, Yan Wang, Jie Li, Ke Deng, Azadeh Alavi, Muhammad Usman, Yongli Ren
arXiv:2607. 01197v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum computing has emerged as a promising computational paradigm for machine learning (ML), with the potential to offer computational advantages over classical approaches.
By Chuanming Yu, Jiaming Liu, Zihao Ge, Xiongfei Wu, Lulu Zhu, Pengzhan Zhao, Jianjun Zhao
arXiv:2606. 12808v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adaptive Hamiltonian learning is central to calibrating and characterizing quantum devices.
By Yash Vardhan Tomar, Dheeraj Peddireddy, Vaneet Aggarwal
arXiv:2606. 18503v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Remaining useful life (RUL) estimation is central to predictive maintenance, where an unplanned failure can cost far more than the asset itself.
By Manoranjan Gandhudi, Arunkumar V., G. R. Anil, Gangadharan G. R
The paper presents a reinforcement‑learning approach to schedule link‑level entanglement in quantum networks, using a Markov Decision Process and double deep Q‑networks with message‑passing neural networks. The resulting policies achieve 100% success rates even when the link activation probability is reduced by up to 71% compared to baseline heuristics, and maintain at least 80% success when task placements are hardware‑restricted. The authors also develop metrics to interpret the learned policy and employ a large language model to generate a heuristic that matches the DQN performance, suggesting a scalable method for extracting interpretable strategies in large quantum networks.
By Leon Rode, Sumeet Khatri, Supartha Podder
Quantum Tiq‑Taq‑Toe is a popular benchmark for quantum computing and machine learning, yet no reinforcement learning (RL) methods have been applied to it. The paper introduces RL techniques for this game, which is simpler than Quantum Chess but still challenging due to partial observability and exponential state complexity. States are represented by a 3×3 measurement matrix and a 9×9 move‑history matrix of entanglement relations, making strategy development difficult because each move can collapse the quantum state.
By Catalin-Viorel Dinu, Thomas Moerland