arXiv:2609.38109v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: The attention operation is naively position invariant. However, positional information is fundamental to natural language, and therefore a variety of...
By Cutter Dawes, Nick Alonso, Tom Figliolia, Beren Millidge
arXiv:2603. 06591v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Transformers frequently allocate disproportionate attention to specific tokens, a phenomenon known as attention sinks.
By Runyu Peng, Ruixiao Li, Mingshu Chen, Yunhua Zhou, Qipeng Guo, Xipeng Qiu, Yucheng Lu, Chen Zhao
The paper proposes an encoder Transformer that explicitly separates semantic, absolute positional (AP), and relative positional (RP) information, restricting the masked‑language‑modeling objective to the semantic stream. This disentanglement reveals that the AP subspace collapses into a low‑frequency two‑dimensional manifold reflecting document structure, that attention heads specialize into structure‑ and semantic‑oriented groups with RP supporting only the latter, and that standard positional encodings fail to robustly encode macroscopic structure. The approach preserves positional encoding and improves performance on 49 out of 65 linguistic phenomena in the Flash‑Holmes probing benchmark.
By Pierre-Antoine Lequeu, Camille Barboule, Benjamin Piwowarski
arXiv:2607. 18363v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Feed-forward networks hold two thirds of a transformer's non-embedding parameters, yet the architecture has not received a necessity test that controls parameters, compute, and depth at once.
By Henry Ndubuaku, Karen Mosoyan, Jakub Mroz, Noah Cylich, Satyajit Kumar, Parkirat Sandhu, Roman Shemet, Justin H Lee
The paper introduces OASIS, a method designed to stabilize dual‑normalized attention‑residual architectures by employing explicit null routing and token‑to‑depth null coupling. OASIS mitigates attention sinks and activation outliers, improving low‑bit quantization performance across several language‑model backbones. Empirical results show significant reductions in attention norms and perplexity, with notable gains on long‑context benchmarks.
By Haozheng Luo, Haoran Dai, Jingyuan Huang, Shaoyang Zhang, Xi Chen, Eric Hanchen Jiang, Yijiang Li, Chenghao Qiu, Chenwei Xu, Zhenyu Pan, Haotian Zhang, Binghui Wang, Yan Chen
arXiv:2606. 04032v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Transformers have become the standard solution for various AI tasks, with the query, key, and value (QKV) attention formulation playing a central role.
By Ali Kayyam, Anusha Madan Gopal, M Anthony Lewis
arXiv:2607. 18759v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transformers with relative positional encodings often extrapolate to sequences longer than those seen during training, whereas transformers with learned absolute encodings typically do not.
By Subham Singh, Ashutosh Mishra, Subha Raut
arXiv:2606. 08105v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When attention concentrates on a single token, a sink, what is the model actually computing?
By Lukas Fesser, Mozes Jacobs, Thomas Fel, Andy Keller, Sham Kakade
The paper proposes a principled way to design hybrid transformer architectures that combine Full Attention (FA) and Linear Attention (LA). By introducing two intervention metrics—RoPE Frequency Importance Score (RFIS) and RoPE Positional Dependence (RPD)—the authors identify a clear taxonomy of retrieval and positional heads, defining a Global Positional Band (GPBand) that aligns with training-length positional scales. Using these insights, they build a Head‑wise Hybrid Architecture (HwH) that assigns FA to global retrieval and LA to local positional modeling, achieving strong language modeling, improved retrieval, and superior zero‑shot long‑context extrapolation compared to standard Transformers and other hybrids.
By Runlin Shi, Bojian Yin, Guoqi Li
arXiv:2602.06471v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The architectural shape of dense Transformers has remained remarkably stable: narrow-wide-narrow feed-forward networks (FFNs) consume most non-embe...
By Feng-Ting Liao, Guan-Ting Yi, Tzu-Quan Lin, Meng-Hsi Chen, Da-shan Shiu
The paper investigates how many transformer components influence a token prediction by measuring the absolute contribution of each unit and channel to the logit. It finds that thousands of components contribute to a single prediction, yet a small subset—often just dozens—carries the majority of the predictive mass. Across models ranging from 124 M to 7 B parameters, the proportion of the model involved in a prediction remains around one to three percent, independent of size, and the study demonstrates that specific components can be directly read and written to modify model behavior without additional training.
By Mark Oskin
arXiv:2606. 17830v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural network parameter spaces are inherently non-injective, as distinct parameter configurations can realize identical functions through functional equivalence.
By Viet-Hoang Tran, Vinh Khanh Bui, Van-Hoan Trinh, Tan Lai Ngoc, Tan M. Nguyen