Parason is a new framework that discovers and exploits both subtask and trial parallelism in large language model (LLM) reasoning. By converting sequential reasoning traces into structured parallel trajectories and training with Parallelism-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization, it balances accuracy, latency, and parallelism. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks such as AIME24 and AIME25 show that Parason achieves an average acceleration of about 1.7× while maintaining competitive accuracy.
By Zhengyang Zhang, Zijian Zhang, Jiaxuan Gao, Shusheng Xu, Yi Wu, Song Han, Ligeng Zhu
arXiv:2608. 16425v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parallel reasoning improves the accuracy and robustness of large reasoning models by exploring multiple solution paths, but its computational cost grows with reasoning depth and branch count.
By Xuteng Zhang, Wenhao Zeng, Xiaodong Gu, Chao Hu, Haotian Lin, Yuling Shi, Min Wang, Beijun Shen
SPIRAL is a reinforcement‑learning framework that trains language models to employ three inference primitives—sequential reasoning within a trace, parallel sampling of independent traces, and aggregation of those traces—within a single compute pipeline. The model first generates multiple independent chain‑of‑thought traces in parallel, then produces a final aggregation trace conditioned on them, with all components optimized end‑to‑end for the reward of the aggregated response. Experiments on reasoning tasks demonstrate that SPIRAL scales efficiently with inference compute, achieving up to 11× better scaling efficiency and 15% higher performance compared to the GRPO baseline when all three primitives are scaled.
By Jubayer Ibn Hamid, Ifdita Hasan Orney, Michael Y. Li, Omar Shaikh, Yoonho Lee, Dorsa Sadigh, Chelsea Finn, Noah Goodman
Language model reasoning can be substantially improved at test time via scaffolds that scale inference compute across different primitives -- sequential reasoning within a trace, independently sampled parallel traces, and aggregation of multiple reasoning traces into a final response. During post-training, however, language models are optimized only for sequential reasoning within a single trace.
arXiv:2505. 12992v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inference-time scaling techniques have significantly bolstered the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by harnessing additional computational effort at inference without retraining.
By Baohao Liao, Hanze Dong, Yuhui Xu, Doyen Sahoo, Christof Monz, Junnan Li, Caiming Xiong
The paper surveys efficient reasoning in large language models, contrasting fast intuitive (System 1) and slow deep (System 2) reasoning. It analyzes why System 2 is computationally costly yet more accurate, and why System 1 is efficient but less effective. The survey covers causes of inefficiency, patterns of reasoning behavior, and potential solutions to balance performance and computational budgets, offering actionable insights and an open‑source repository for ongoing research.
By Rui Wang, Hongru Wang, Boyang Xue, Jianhui Pang, Shudong Liu, Yi Chen, Jiahao Qiu, Derek Fai Wong, Heng Ji, Kam-Fai Wong
The paper examines the computational challenges of training Reasoning Language Models (RLMs) using reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) and similar post‑training methods. It provides a compute‑centric analysis of popular RL algorithms such as PPO and GRPO, and introduces a taxonomy of intra‑ and inter‑model parallelism strategies—including traditional and novel techniques—to improve scalability and cost‑efficiency. The authors also evaluate existing RLM frameworks and offer practical guidelines and research directions for building high‑performance, scalable RLMs.
arXiv:2607. 01077v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While inference-time scaling has improved the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs), the need to generate long chains-of-thought (CoTs) is a computational bottleneck.
By Xuecheng Liu, Daman Arora, Gokul Swamy, Andrea Zanette
arXiv:2511. 08577v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Improving the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), especially under parameter constraints, is crucial for real-world applications.
By Tianyu Fu, Yichen You, Zekai Chen, Guohao Dai, Huazhong Yang, Yu Wang
arXiv:2605.06165v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: As the widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) accelerates, token consumption from intermediate reasoning traces increasingly contribut...
By Richmond Sin Jing Xuan, Rishabh Bhardwaj, Soujanya Poria
arXiv:2511.08577v4 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Improving the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), especially under parameter constraints, is crucial for real-world applicat...
By Tianyu Fu, Yichen You, Zekai Chen, Guohao Dai, Huazhong Yang, Yu Wang
InternBootcamp is an open‑source framework that offers over 1,000 domain‑diverse task environments for large language model (LLM) reasoning research. It introduces Bootcamp‑Eval, an automatically generated benchmark for comprehensive performance assessment. Experiments show that training on InternBootcamp significantly improves reasoning performance, with a 32B model achieving state‑of‑the‑art results on Bootcamp‑Eval and other established benchmarks, demonstrating that scaling the number of training tasks yields consistent gains.
By Peiji Li, Jiasheng Ye, Yongkang Chen, Linyang Li, Yichuan Ma, Zijie Yu, Ganqu Cui, Haozhan Li, Jiacheng Chen, Chengqi Lyu, Wenwei Zhang, Qipeng Guo, Dahua Lin, Bowen Zhou, Kai Chen