arXiv Machine Learning

Privacy from Symmetry: Orthogonally Equivariant Transformers for LLM Inference

arXiv:2606. 16461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Running large language models locally is often impractical, pushing inference on sensitive text to third-party providers.

arXiv AI
Sep 15

SpliTEE: Improving LLM Inference on Trusted Hardware with Differentially Private GPU Outsourcing

SpliTEE extends the split‑inference architecture of Slalom to large language models by protecting intermediate GPU computations with differential privacy rather than encryption. The authors show that masking intermediate representations is essential, as a prompt‑reconstruction attack can recover prompts with about 80% accuracy. Their global sensitivity analysis bounds the noise needed, and they demonstrate that SpliTEE on Intel TDX achieves near‑double the speed of fully CPU‑based inference and outperforms encryption‑based Slalom while maintaining higher accuracy.

By Shashie Dilhara Batan Arachchige, Robin Carpentier, Hassan Jameel Asghar, Dali Kaafar
arXiv AI
Aug 3

MOSAIC: Masked Outsourcing of Secure AI Computations

arXiv:2607. 29221v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We address the challenge of securely and efficiently outsourcing AI computations from a trusted but computationally weak client to an untrusted but powerful server, in the setting where the client holds both the input and the model, and the server must learn neither.

By James Hsin-yu Chiang, Sheila Zingg, Kari Kostiainen, Srdjan Capkun
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Position Matters: Feature Inversion Attacks in ViT Split Inference with Token Reduction and Shuffling

The paper investigates privacy risks in Vision Transformer (ViT) split‑inference systems that use token reduction and token shuffling to lower computation and communication costs. It shows that even after token shuffling, transmitted token embeddings still contain enough positional information for a new attack, the Spatially Aligned Reconstruction Attack (SARA), which predicts token positions, restores spatial layout, fills missing embeddings with a masked autoencoder, and reconstructs the input image. While token reduction offers stronger protection, significant leakage remains when retained tokens preserve semantic and positional cues, and the authors propose a lightweight edge‑side defense that removes positional embeddings and adapts transformer blocks via knowledge distillation to reduce SARA’s effectiveness without harming downstream accuracy.

By Stefano Leggio, Giulio Rossolini, Alessandro Biondi