arXiv Machine Learning By William Merrill, Hongjian Jiang, Yanhong Li, Anthony Lin, Ashish Sabharwal

Why Are Linear RNNs More Parallelizable?

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2603. 03612v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The community is increasingly exploring linear RNNs (LRNNs) as language models, motivated by their expressive power and parallelizability.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jun 19

Efficiently Representing Algorithms With Chain-of-Thought Transformers

arXiv:2606. 19697v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The increasing popularity of \emph{reasoning} models -- language models that output a series of reasoning or thought tokens before producing an answer -- is justified, in part, by theoretical results showing that chain-of-thought (CoT) transformers can simulate Turing machines, and thus perform arbitrary computation.

By Yanhong Li, Anej Svete, Ashish Sabharwal, William Merrill
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 4

Separating quantum circuits from classical LLMs

Modern large language models - transformers and diffusion language models - are built around two canonical algorithmic tasks: prediction and generation. We prove unconditional separations between low-depth quantum computation and the corresponding bounded-resource classical language-model architectures in both regimes.