arXiv Machine Learning By Shuaijun Liu, Feiyang You, Xingwei Chen, Ningxin Su

When Replanning Becomes the Bottleneck: Budgeted Replanning for Embodied Agents

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2608. 01428v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Embodied agents replan frequently to recover from execution drift, partial observability, and coordination hazards, but each LLM-based replanning call can consume an accumulated textual context that grows over time and across agents.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 17

HaReCAP: Habitual-action Grounding for Recursive Large Language Model Agents

Long-horizon embodied tasks require LLM agents to iteratively decompose high-level goals, revise plans in response to environmental feedback, and ground leaf-level subgoals into valid executable actions. Recursive context-management methods such as ReCAP improve planning stability through multi-level task decomposition and parent-node refinement, but still repeatedly invoke the LLM at leaf nodes to ground atomic subtasks into exact valid actions.

arXiv AI
Jun 11

DIRECT: When and Where Should You Allocate Test-Time Compute in Embodied Planners?

arXiv:2606. 12402v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed as high-level planners for embodied agents, with an emerging strategy of scaling test-time compute to improve capability.

By Jadelynn Dao, Milan Ganai, Yasmina Abukhadra, Ajay Sridhar, Mozhgan Nasr Azadani, Katie Luo, Clark Barrett, Jiajun Wu, Chelsea Finn, Marco Pavone