arXiv Machine Learning By Shuaijun Liu, Feiyang You, Xingwei Chen, Ningxin Su

When Replanning Becomes the Bottleneck: Budgeted Replanning for Embodied Agents

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2608. 01428v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Embodied agents replan frequently to recover from execution drift, partial observability, and coordination hazards, but each LLM-based replanning call can consume an accumulated textual context that grows over time and across agents.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
2d ago

HaReCAP: Habitual-action Grounding for Recursive Large Language Model Agents

Long-horizon embodied tasks require LLM agents to iteratively decompose high-level goals, revise plans in response to environmental feedback, and ground leaf-level subgoals into valid executable actions. Recursive context-management methods such as ReCAP improve planning stability through multi-level task decomposition and parent-node refinement, but still repeatedly invoke the LLM at leaf nodes to ground atomic subtasks into exact valid actions.

arXiv AI
Jun 11

DIRECT: When and Where Should You Allocate Test-Time Compute in Embodied Planners?

arXiv:2606. 12402v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed as high-level planners for embodied agents, with an emerging strategy of scaling test-time compute to improve capability.

By Jadelynn Dao, Milan Ganai, Yasmina Abukhadra, Ajay Sridhar, Mozhgan Nasr Azadani, Katie Luo, Clark Barrett, Jiajun Wu, Chelsea Finn, Marco Pavone