arXiv AI By Drishti Goel, Violeta J. Rodriguez, Daniel S. Brown, Ravi Karkar, Dong Whi Yoo, Koustuv Saha

When AI Says "I have been in similar situations": Synthetic Lived Experience in Peer-Like Caregiver Support

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 18057v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Caregivers often turn to online communities for informational and emotional support.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 16

CareMirror: Bringing Caregiver Wellbeing into the Dementia Care Ecosystem

arXiv:2609.17434v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Family caregivers of people living with dementia shoulder emotional and practical responsibilities, yet their own wellbeing often remains peripheral...

By Jiayue Melissa Shi, Ethan Nguyen, Drishti Goel, Upasana Natarajan, Shashwat Srivatsa, Daniel S. Brown, Violeta J. Rodr\'iguez, Dong Whi Yoo, Ravi Karkar, Koustuv Saha
arXiv AI
Aug 24

Significant Other AI: Identity, Memory, and Emotional Regulation as Long-Term Relational Intelligence

The paper proposes a new class of relational AI called Significant Other Artificial Intelligence (SO‑AI), designed to emulate the stabilizing role of human significant others by providing identity awareness, long‑term memory, proactive support, narrative co‑construction, and ethical boundary enforcement. It outlines a conceptual architecture featuring an anthropomorphic interface, a relational cognition layer, and a governance layer, and presents a research agenda for evaluating identity stability, interaction patterns, narrative development, and sociocultural impact. The authors argue that SO‑AI could fill the relational anchor gap many people experience today, offering a blueprint for responsibly augmenting long‑term, identity‑bearing partnerships between humans and AI.

By Sung Park
arXiv AI
Sep 21

Aligning with Lived Experience: Heterogeneous Benefits of Fine Tuning in Mental Health Support Generation

The paper introduces the COmmunity-centered Peer Engaged Support (COPES) dataset and a three‑axis evaluation framework to gauge how well Large Language Models (LLMs) align with community perspectives on mental‑health support queries. Experiments show that fine‑tuning LLMs on COPES improves strategy alignment and emotion‑tone alignment by over 50% for general‑purpose models, yet these gains are uneven across subreddits and coping strategies. The study also finds that post‑training shifts the model’s recommendations toward problem‑focused advice while reducing emotion‑focused responses, indicating persistent disparities in performance across different communities and needs.

By Mohit Chandra, Nabin Kim, Eli Min, Aamogh Sawant, Tanmay Sutar, Munmun De Choudhury