arXiv Machine Learning By Bohao Liao, Boyu Deng, Qipeng Song, Jieling Wang, Jingchao Wang

TCHG: Tri-Trust Conditioned Heterogeneous Graph Learning for Reliable Dynamic Trust Prediction

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 16611v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Trust prediction infers latent user-user trust relations and provides important support for social recommendation, fake-review and manipulation detection, and risk identification.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
4d ago

LLM4Trust: Exploring the Capabilities of Large Language Models for Trust Evaluation

The paper introduces LLM4Trust, a benchmark framework that evaluates large language models (LLMs) for trust assessment in cybersecurity. It constructs trust graphs to represent five fundamental trust properties, designs property‑understanding tasks, and tests eight LLMs across nine prompting strategies. The study identifies effective LLM‑prompt combinations, applies them to real datasets, proposes methods to handle context limits, and demonstrates that LLMs can understand trust properties while highlighting vulnerabilities and high inference costs, for which defense mechanisms and batch inference are suggested.

By Jie Wang, Yanbo Sun, Zheng Yan, Jiahe Lan, Elisa Bertino
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 9

Evi-VN: Hard Region Guided Virtual Node Evidence Injection for GNN-Based Fraud Detection

Evi-VN is a new framework for graph neural network (GNN) fraud detection that injects evidence from diverse modalities—structured records, text, images, and audio—into virtual node representations. It targets shared hard regions where standard GNNs fail to distinguish well‑disguised fraudsters from legitimate users, correcting blind spots without disrupting reliable predictions. Experiments on bot, fake‑review, refund‑evidence, and telecom‑fraud datasets demonstrate its effectiveness across generic, fraud‑specific, and unseen GNNs.

By Jiran Tao, Yifan Wu, Binyan Jiang
arXiv AI
Sep 28

A Survey on Fake Review Detection: From Pre-trained Language Models to Large Language Models

The article surveys fake review detection research, focusing on how pre‑trained language models (PLMs) and large language models (LLMs) influence both the generation of deceptive reviews and their detection. It reviews 211 studies from 2018 to early 2026, categorizing methods by evidence source—such as review text, sentiment, rating behavior, temporal metadata, user‑product graphs, multimodal content, external knowledge, and LLM‑generated signals—and by fusion level. The survey traces the evolution from traditional machine learning to PLM‑based and LLM‑based approaches, evaluates performance on Amazon, Yelp, and OpSpam benchmarks, and highlights open challenges including adversarial generation, cross‑domain transfer, uncertainty‑aware fusion, robustness to missing sources, interpretability, and trustworthy evaluation of AI‑generated deceptive content.

By Fanji Yang (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics), Huiyao Chen (Harbin Institute of Technology), Xi Yu (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics), Meishan Zhang (Harbin Institute of Technology), Xiaohong Xiao (Guizhou University of Commerce), Mingsen Deng (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics)
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 24

TH-GNN: Heterogeneous Temporal Graph Neural Networks for LLM-Agent Shilling Attack Detection

TH-GNN is a heterogeneous temporal graph neural network designed to detect shilling attacks generated by large language model (LLM) agents. It combines a two‑layer Heterogeneous Graph Transformer with per‑type and per‑relation attention, learnable sinusoidal temporal encodings, cross‑modal attention that fuses user embeddings with frozen RoBERTa representations of reviews and item descriptions, and a GRU that models log inter‑arrival times. Across five attack families and four benchmark datasets, TH‑GNN achieves a grand‑mean F1 score of 0.870, surpassing the best text‑only baseline on Agent4SR attacks by 10.9 percentage points and 11.5 percentage points at the lowest injection rate.

By Shivam Swarup, Divya Prakash Shrivastava, Rakesh Thakur
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Building Trustworthy Graph-Agentic RAG for Social Good: Architectures, Failure Propagation, and Assurance by Construction

The paper introduces Graph‑Agentic Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG), a system that blends structured evidence with adaptive agents capable of planning retrieval, navigating relations, verifying claims, delegating tasks, and employing tools. It highlights how defects in graph construction can propagate through retrieval and control decisions, potentially leading to significant outcomes. To address these risks, the authors propose an assurance‑by‑construction framework with five interface contracts—evidence, retrieval, reasoning, capability & delegation, and outcome—that make provenance, validity, authorization, uncertainty, and recoverability explicit, and outline an evaluation agenda for social‑good applications.

By Vijay Bommireddy, Raviteja Bommireddy