arXiv:2606. 29972v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most of the existing neuro-symbolic AI methods focus on the scenario of static knowledge where objects do not change according to a temporal dimension.
By Luca Boscarato, Ivan Donadello, Alessandro Artale, Marco Montali, Fabrizio Maria Maggi
arXiv:2608. 16443v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neurosymbolic (NeSy) Artificial Intelligence aims to integrate Deep Learning (DL) architectures with symbolic reasoning.
By Riccardo Andreoni, Andrei Buliga, Alessandro Daniele, Paolo Felli, Chiara Ghidini, Marco Montali, Massimiliano Ronzani
arXiv:2606. 17882v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bridges between graph neural networks (GNNs) and logical formalisms have been established by fixing architectural choices, such as the types of aggregation, combination, and activation functions.
By Przemys{\l}aw Andrzej Wa{\l}\k{e}ga, Bernardo Cuenca Grau
arXiv:2606. 19279v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neurosymbolic semantics is fragmented: classical, fuzzy, probabilistic and neural systems each define truth by their own inductive rules.
By Daniel Romero Schellhorn, Till Mossakowski, Bj\"orn Gehrke
arXiv:2506.05626v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Real-world knowledge can take various forms, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. Among these, Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are...
By Xiaohua Lu, Liubov Tupikina, Mehwish Alam
The paper introduces a graphical notation, adapted from Penrose tensor notation, to design and represent interpretable AI architectures. This notation provides a global view of an architecture and maps directly onto PyTorch einsum code, enabling clear depiction of tensor manipulations. The authors apply the notation to several interpretable models—concept bottlenecks, sparse probes, prototype networks, neural additive models, and mixtures of linear models—and use it to diagram the key components of the Steerling-8B language model, revealing its residual structure and allowing a concise 33‑line PyTorch implementation.
By Pietro Barbiero