arXiv:2606. 29972v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most of the existing neuro-symbolic AI methods focus on the scenario of static knowledge where objects do not change according to a temporal dimension.
By Luca Boscarato, Ivan Donadello, Alessandro Artale, Marco Montali, Fabrizio Maria Maggi
arXiv:2608. 16443v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neurosymbolic (NeSy) Artificial Intelligence aims to integrate Deep Learning (DL) architectures with symbolic reasoning.
By Riccardo Andreoni, Andrei Buliga, Alessandro Daniele, Paolo Felli, Chiara Ghidini, Marco Montali, Massimiliano Ronzani
arXiv:2606. 17882v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bridges between graph neural networks (GNNs) and logical formalisms have been established by fixing architectural choices, such as the types of aggregation, combination, and activation functions.
By Przemys{\l}aw Andrzej Wa{\l}\k{e}ga, Bernardo Cuenca Grau
arXiv:2606. 19279v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neurosymbolic semantics is fragmented: classical, fuzzy, probabilistic and neural systems each define truth by their own inductive rules.
By Daniel Romero Schellhorn, Till Mossakowski, Bj\"orn Gehrke
arXiv:2606. 11946v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The conventional approach to deep learning over relational databases applies neural models, such as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), to a graph representation of the database.
By Arie Soeteman, Balder ten Cate, Maurice Funk, Benny Kimelfeld, Carsten Lutz, Moritz Sch\"onherr
The conventional approach to deep learning over relational databases applies neural models, such as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), to a graph representation of the database. Recent approaches instead operate on databases directly, associating tuples with embeddings and extending query mechanisms to jointly process embeddings and relational content.