arXiv Machine Learning By Yang Pan, Helmut B\"olcskei

Recovering Governing Equations from Solution Data: Identifiability Bounds for Linear and Nonlinear ODEs

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 27285v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning governing equations from observed solution data is a fundamental challenge in scientific machine learning \cite{bruntonDiscoveringGoverningEquations2016,kovachkiNeuralOperatorLearning2023,longPDENetLearningPDEs2018,rudyDatadrivenDiscoveryPartial2017,raonicConvolutionalNeuralOperators2023}, yet the theoretical conditions under which a ground-truth ODE can be uniquely and stably identified from multiple solution observations remain largely undeveloped, and no quantitative analysis of the sample complexity of such learning tasks exists in the literature.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 25

Recovering Governing Equations from Solution Data: Identifiability Bounds for Linear and Nonlinear ODEs

Learning governing equations from observed solution data is a fundamental challenge in scientific machine learning \cite{bruntonDiscoveringGoverningEquations2016,kovachkiNeuralOperatorLearning2023,longPDENetLearningPDEs2018,rudyDatadrivenDiscoveryPartial2017,raonicConvolutionalNeuralOperators2023}, yet the theoretical conditions under which a ground-truth ODE can be uniquely and stably identified from multiple solution observations remain largely undeveloped, and no quantitative analysis of the sample complexity of such learning tasks exists in the literature. To address this gap, we introduce the Hausdorff distance on solution sets as the natural metric for comparing differential equations, since it captures the worst-case separation between two equations over all admissible initial conditions and thus encodes the minimax structure of the identification problem.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

Fast Learning Rates for Physics-Informed Kernel Methods

arXiv:2609. 18901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In physics-informed machine learning, a target function $u^*$ is learned from noisy value observations $y_i=u^*(x_i)+ \varepsilon_i$, together with differential information, given either by noisy observations $d_j=(Du^*)(z_j)+\xi_j$ or by a known physical constraint $Du^*=v$.

By Luc Brogat-Motte, Joachim Bona-Pellissier, Giacomo Meanti, Lorenzo Rosasco
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 26

Finite-Sample Metric Non-Collapse for Geometrically Supervised Latent World Models in Control

The paper presents a finite‑sample learning‑to‑control framework for geometrically supervised latent models of nonlinear deterministic systems. It introduces an encoder‑only local–global metric hinge that ensures directional resolution and state discrimination, and proves that any approximate empirical minimizer is pointwise co‑Lipschitz and uniformly approximately semiconjugate to the true dynamics under regularity assumptions. The results provide explicit bounds on approximation, sampling, and optimization errors, and demonstrate through controlled experiments that restoring metric resolution improves control performance.

By Alain Bensoussan, Minh-Nhat Phung, Minh-Binh Tran
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

A Closed-Form Formula for Consistent Lipschitz Regression on Metric Spaces with Sparse Neural Network Realizations

arXiv:2609. 03129v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Several classical machine-learning methods, such as KRRs and SVRs, are both computationally and analytically tractable since their estimators either admit closed-form expressions or are obtained by minimizing convex training objectives; neither feature is generally available for deep neural networks.

By Ruiyang Hong, Hrad Ghoukasian, Anastasis Kratsios