arXiv Machine Learning By Chunyang Zhao, Chresten Tr{\ae}holt

Quantifying the Gap Between Laboratory Battery Test Patterns and Field Duty Profiles

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2608. 16212v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Laboratory battery tests provide the main empirical basis for battery performance and degradation studies, but their operating patterns do not directly represent field duty profiles.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
2d ago

Quantifying the Gap Between Laboratory Battery Test Patterns and Field Duty Profiles

Laboratory battery tests provide the main empirical basis for battery performance and degradation studies, but their operating patterns do not directly represent field duty profiles. This paper quantifies the gap by comparing six accessible evidence sources covering controlled cycling, drive-cycle testing, dynamic cycling, NMC811 laboratory ageing, a real electric-vehicle charging trace, and fleet-scale electric-vehicle state-of-health (SOH) data.