arXiv AI By Saurabh Ranjan, Brian Odegaard

Psychological Imagination Networks Show Cross-Population Centrality and Clustering Alignment in Humans That Large Language Models Fail to Replicate

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2510. 04391v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Mental imagery vividness is a stable individual trait, yet whether imagined scenarios share relational structure across human and synthetic large language model (LLM) populations remains unknown.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 11

Large Language Models Align with the Human Brain during Creative Thinking

arXiv:2604. 03480v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Creative thinking is a fundamental aspect of human cognition, and divergent thinking-the capacity to generate novel and varied ideas-is widely regarded as its core generative engine.

By Mete Ismayilzada, Simone A. Luchini, Abdulkadir Gokce, Badr AlKhamissi, Antoine Bosselut, Antonio Laverghetta Jr., Lonneke van der Plas, Roger E. Beaty
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

Readable, Faithful, Used: Three Dissociable Properties of Demographic Identity in a Language Model

The study investigates how demographic identity is represented in a language model, using representational similarity analysis against Pew survey data across 169 demographic cells. It finds that standard last‑token read‑outs underestimate the model’s fidelity, while specific attention heads (notably L11 H16) capture demographic structure more accurately, though race‑based types remain weak. Causal interventions reveal that high fidelity does not guarantee causal use, and a 128‑dimensional probe of a single head improves alignment with survey truth but fails to recover per‑question group ordering.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 8

Billions of Sketches Reveal Hidden Cultural Variation in Human Concepts

Claims about the universality of human concepts have been predominantly assessed through linguistic similarity across languages and cultures. However, words are effective as communication devices because they compress rich experiential variation into shared conventions, potentially obscuring hidden individual and cultural differences in how concepts are mentally represented.