arXiv Machine Learning By Sooho Moon, Yunyong Ko

PROBE-Web: An Interactive System for Probing Evaluation Landscapes of Knowledge Graph Completion Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 08926v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge graph completion (KGC) models are commonly evaluated using rank-based metrics such as MRR and Hits@K, despite different users often requiring different evaluation perspectives.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9

Generalized Rank-based Evaluation for Knowledge Graph Completion: Perspectives, Framework, and Analyses

arXiv:2606. 08921v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge graph completion (KGC) aims to predict missing facts from an observed knowledge graph (KG), playing a crucial role in a wide range of real-world applications such as drug discovery, recommender systems, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).

By Sooho Moon, Jian Kang, Yunyong Ko
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Unifying Post-hoc Explanations of Knowledge Graph Completions

arXiv:2507. 22951v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Knowledge Graphs organize information as entity-relation-entity triples, enabling machine learning models to predict plausible missing triples in a task known as Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC).

By Alessandro Lonardi, Samy Badreddine, Tarek R. Besold, Pablo Sanchez Martin
arXiv AI
Aug 11

HugSelect: An Explainable Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Framework for foundation-model selection

arXiv:2608. 08069v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models are increasingly reused as software components, making model selection a critical software-engineering decision.

By Alireza Joonbakhsh (Shiraz University), Arda Canser Adal{\i} (Utrecht University), Slinger Jansen (Utrecht University), Farshad Khunjush (Shiraz University), Siamak Farshidi (Wageningen University,Research)
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 26

DualEval: Joint Model-Item Calibration for Unified LLM Evaluation

arXiv:2606. 26429v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current LLM evaluation relies on two complementary but often disconnected signals: static benchmarks with objective correctness labels and arena-style preference data that better reflect open-ended user interactions.

By Aaron J. Li, Hao Huang, Youngmin Park, Yitong Ma, Wei-Lin Chiang, Li Chen, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Bin Yu, Ion Stoica