arXiv:2606. 18816v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hybrid brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that integrate motor imagery (MI) and steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) provide high-dimensional neural decoding but typically exceed the computational limits of embedded hardware.
By Gourav Siddhad, Yogesh Kumar Meena
arXiv:2608. 05315v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) based Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) often require unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) to generalize across subjects and sessions.
By Shiwen Chu, Shanglin Li, Motoaki Kawanabe, Reinmar Kobler
arXiv:2607. 03094v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) decoding for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) faces a major challenge: substantial inter-subject variability limits effective cross-subject generalization.
By Aymen Sarhane, Fouad Lbakali, Mouad Souissi, Jonathan Lys, Giulia Lioi
arXiv:2510. 15371v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals obtained during motor imagery (MI) has substantial application potential, including communication assistance and rehabilitation support for patients with motor impairments.
By Shuntaro Suzuki, Shunya Nagashima, Komei Sugiura
arXiv:2511. 18940v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Cross-subject motor imagery decoding remains a fundamental challenge in EEG-based brain-computer interfaces due to substantial inter-subject variability.
By Sanjeev Manivannan, Chandra Shekar Lakshminarayan
Decoding continuous three-dimensional (3D) motor imagery (MI) using non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain--computer interfaces (BCIs) remains challenging due to signal variability and residual decoding errors. Deep learning architectures such as convolutional neural network--long short-term memory (CNN--LSTM) models can capture spatial and temporal dynamics for continuous kinematic decoding; however, systematic residual errors persist in predicted trajectories.