arXiv:2607. 07156v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Implicit bias is usually explained as the preference of an optimization process for certain final solutions and their geometry.
By Zhang Gongyue, Wang Zhiyong, Liu Donghan, Ren Weihong, Sheng Yixuan, Liu Honghai
The paper identifies a problem called Gradient-Update Mismatch (GUM), where optimizers can alter conflict-free gradient directions produced by gradient surgery, leading to conflicts between physics residual and boundary condition losses in Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). To address this, the authors propose Gradient-Update Alignment (GUA), which projects the optimizer’s update onto the conflict-free cone and adjusts internal optimizer state accordingly. Experiments show GUM is common across many optimizers, and GUA consistently eliminates conflicts and significantly reduces error in PINN training.
By Jing Xiao, Xinhai Chen, Qinglin Wang, Menghan Jia, Zhiquan Lai, Dongsheng Li, Jie Liu, Tiejun Li
The paper introduces the "lift" technique for training input‑convex neural networks, replacing the traditional non‑negative weight constraint enforced by projected gradient descent or a softplus map. By adding a learnable slack variable and an unconstrained network that processes a permutation‑invariant batch summary, the lift couples batch‑dependent latent weights to the gradient, increasing update variance and enabling faster escape from the softplus shoulder. Experiments show that when the softplus method stalls at the shoulder, the lift achieves tighter fits and reconstructs targets roughly three times faster, while both methods agree when the shoulder is rarely reached.
By Ali Siahkoohi
The paper introduces Activation-Keyed Momentum (AK‑Momentum), a momentum update that uses the input activation of a linear layer as a key to apply a delta‑rule update, allowing each direction to decay at a rate proportional to its frequency of appearance. AK‑Momentum is proven to be a valid momentum, incorporates input‑side curvature correction without matrix inversion, and clears stale directions faster than traditional exponential moving average (EMA) under both fixed and drifting optima. It can replace the momentum buffer of any optimizer, scales with width under μP, adds only 22–25% extra compute, and demonstrates significant step‑count reductions in FineWeb‑Edu pretraining and other benchmarks.
whyItMatters":"AK‑Momentum offers a principled, efficient way to adapt momentum decay to anisotropic training dynamics, improving convergence speed and stability across a range of models and datasets."
By Euijin Hong, Guannan Qu
arXiv:2608. 19491v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most modern optimizers form their momentum as an exponential moving average (EMA) of past gradients, forgetting every direction at one fixed rate.
By Euijin Hong, Guannan Qu
arXiv:2607. 09967v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many neural networks operations have a multiplicative nature rather than additive: halving or doubling a norm are analogous relatively but require unequal optimization distances when taking linear steps.
By Ethan Smith