arXiv:2608. 10545v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Edge LLMs must preserve inference continuity when a user hands over between edge nodes, requiring key-value (KV) cache transfer to the target node.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608. 08684v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-context LLM inference is bottlenecked by KV cache memory, yet distributing a limited cache budget across layers remains challenging.
arXiv:2608. 16477v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-RAN brings large language model (LLM) serving close to mobile users, but cellular handover can separate an active request from its inference state: the user attaches to a target base station (gNB) while the large and growing key-value (KV) cache remains at the source.
arXiv:2606. 13126v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented and agentic workloads repeatedly prefill recurring predictable structured inputs (which we call "spans") such as documents and code files.
Retrieval-augmented and agentic workloads repeatedly prefill recurring predictable structured inputs (which we call "spans") such as documents and code files. Yet, prefix caching in engines such as vLLM cannot reuse their KV entries unless they share identical prefixes with another request, while Position-Independent Caching (PIC) implementations within production-grade inference servers typically either require substantial server code changes or keep KV state outside the server, incurring host-to-device transfer overhead.
arXiv:2608. 01247v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Query-agnostic KV cache eviction compresses a context once and reuses the resulting cache for arbitrary future queries, but performance can collapse under tight budgets.
AI-RAN brings large language model (LLM) serving close to mobile users, but cellular handover can separate an active request from its inference state: the user attaches to a target base station (gNB) while the large and growing key-value (KV) cache remains at the source. Retaining inference at the source preserves service continuity but persistently increases inter-token latency (ITL), whereas recovering the state at the target restores serving locality but requires KV-cache transfer, recomputation, or a combination of both only after handover, directly prolonging service interruption time (SIT).