arXiv AI By Yifan Zhang, Chen Huang, Yueke Zhang, Jiahao Zhang, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Collin McMillan, Kevin Leach, Yu Huang

EyeMulator: Improving Code Language Models by Mimicking Human Visual Attention

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2508. 16771v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Code Language Models (CodeLLMs) learn token importance from data correlations, whereas human developers attend selectively to semantically salient code.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

RAVE: Re-Allocating Visual Attention in Large Multimodal Models

RAVE (Re-Allocating Visual Attention) is a lightweight pair‑gating mechanism that adds a learned query‑key bias to pre‑softmax attention scores over visual keys, derived from pre‑RoPE query and key features. It requires no architectural changes to the backbone and can be trained end‑to‑end with the rest of the model. Across multiple multimodal benchmarks, RAVE improves standard attention by an average of 3 points, especially on perception‑intensive tasks such as multilingual OCR, chart understanding, document VQA, and scene text VQA.

By Xi Leng, Xinhong Ma, Ziqiang Dong, Feng Zhang, Xiaoying Tang, Yang Yang, Guanjun Jiang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
6d ago

When Text Matters: Design Principles for Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Model

The paper introduces a training‑free visual token pruning strategy for vision‑language models that separates early vision‑guided pruning from later text‑guided reselection. By first pruning tokens with vision‑encoder attention, retaining candidates until the decoder midpoint, and then applying text‑to‑visual attention, the method preserves task‑relevant visual information. Across eight benchmarks and three models, it achieves an average performance recovery of 11.10 and 16.84 percentage points at 80% and 90% pruning, respectively, while maintaining comparable or lower LLM‑prefill latency.