arXiv AI By Aleksander {\O}stensen, Alberto Mino Calero, Anastasios M. Lekkas, Adil Rasheed

Evaluating LLMs as Interpretable Controllers for Dynamical Systems

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 22609v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for decision-making and reasoning tasks, yet their potential as controllers for physical systems remains largely unexplored.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 8

Agentic Physical AI toward a Domain-Specific Foundation Model for Energy Systems: A Case Study on Nuclear Reactor Control

arXiv:2512. 23292v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The prevailing paradigm in AI for physical systems: scaling general-purpose foundation models toward universal multimodal reasoning, confronts a barrier at the control interface.

By Yoon Pyo Lee, Samrendra Roy, Kazuma Kobayashi, Sajedul Talukder, Diab Abueidda, Seid Koric, Souvik Chakraborty, Syed Bahauddin Alam
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Mimir: Physics-Grounded LLM Agents for Long-Horizon Irrigation Control

Mimir is a physics‑grounded large language model agent designed for long‑horizon irrigation control. It operates on two timescales: a fast scale that uses a structured physical interface and deterministic simulator to validate and refine LLM proposals before execution, and a slow scale that consolidates recurrent failure patterns into persistent contextual principles. Across multiple sites, crops, and years, Mimir achieves the lowest aggregate control cost and reduces irrigation usage by about 51% compared to historical schedules, while ablation studies confirm the importance of forward simulation, verified revision, and persistent context.

By Yimeng Liu, Mi Zhang, Younsuk Dong, Zhichao Cao
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

Decoupled Physical Modeling and Execution for Physics Reasoning

The paper introduces a framework that separates physical modeling from execution in physics reasoning tasks. It uses a two‑stage post‑training approach: supervised fine‑tuning to build structured models and reinforcement learning with rubric‑based feedback to refine them. Experiments on PhysReason, PhyX, and SeePhys show that this explicit modeling improves reasoning performance by about 3% on average for small LLMs.

By Ye Zhang, Xuehang Guo, Rui Pan, Pengfei Yu, Denghui Zhang, Manling Li, Qingyun Wang