arXiv AI By Kanishk Kushwaha, Vikrant Vinod Bansode, Harsh Vardhan, Dhaval C. Patel

DynAMO:Dynamic Asset Management Orchestration via Topological Multi-Agent Scheduling

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 19382v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While LLM-powered agents offer end-to-end automation for industrial asset lifecycles, real-world Industry 4.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 26

PeakBench: Benchmarking Resource-Aware Tool Invocation in LLM Agents

PeakBench is a new benchmark designed to evaluate how large language model agents invoke multiple tools while respecting resource constraints and parallel execution. It provides executable multi‑tool workflows with dependency annotations and measured resource profiles, and introduces a two‑part evaluation framework that separates logical planning from physical scheduling. The study shows that strong logical planning alone does not guarantee safe or efficient execution, and that providing resource information can reduce overflows and improve utilization.

By Zhi-Kai Chen, Xu-Xiang Zhong, Song-Yan Li, De-Chuan Zhan, Han-Jia Ye
arXiv AI
Sep 1

AssetOpsBench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Task Automation in Industrial Asset Operations and Maintenance

arXiv:2506.03828v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: AI for Industrial Asset Lifecycle Management aims to automate complex operational workflows, such as condition monitoring and maintenance schedulin...

By Dhaval Patel, Shuxin Lin, James Rayfield, Nianjun Zhou, Chathurangi Shyalika, Suryanarayana R Yarrabothula, Roman Vaculin, Natalia Martinez, Fearghal O'donncha, Jayant Kalagnanam
arXiv AI
Sep 18

Architectural Design, Not Only Model Intelligence, Governs Multi-Agent LLM Performance

The paper argues that the architecture of multi‑agent large language model (LLM) frameworks, rather than just the intelligence of the underlying models, largely determines system performance. It introduces a taxonomy of architectural dimensions—such as orchestration, memory, planning interfaces, specialization, and communication topology—and presents MAFBench, a unified evaluation suite. An empirical study across nine frameworks, keeping the LLM constant, reveals six design principles and shows that choices like orchestration and communication topology can dramatically affect latency, accuracy, and coordination success.

By Abdelghny Orogat, Ana Rostam, Essam Mansour