arXiv AI By Rasheed Mudasiru

Deterministic Replay for AI Agent Systems

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 16200v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agent systems that couple large language models (LLMs) with external tools and APIs are inherently non-deterministic: LLM sampling variance, external API state, CDN infrastructure headers, and execution-environment noise collectively prevent any prior agent run from being faithfully re-executed.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 11

Can AI Agents Detect and Repair Artifact Drift in Network Experiments?

The paper introduces NetArtifactBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate whether AI agents can detect and repair inconsistencies in network experiment records while preserving supported claims. It tests 23 agent configurations on 52 instances with injected inconsistencies, finding an average pass rate of 65.3 % but no runtime exceeding 30 % for complex repairs that require recovering implicit relations and propagating changes across artifacts. The results highlight a clear distinction between local corrections and full record-level repair, leading the authors to argue that artifact integrity should be a primary design and evaluation criterion for AI agents in network systems.

By Tianzhu Zhang, Weichen Tao, Changgang Zheng, Yusheng Zheng, Long Chen, Xiaoyi Fan, Meikang Qiu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13

BackendForge: Benchmarking Agentic End-to-End Code Generation with Backend Services

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in agentic coding settings, where they can inspect files, execute commands, run tests, observe failures, and iteratively revise code. This shift raises a central evaluation question: can an agentic LLM generate an end-to-end software artifact that is both deployable and behaviorally correct under execution?

arXiv AI
Sep 18

Chronicle: Cut-Point Replay for Regression Testing of LLM Agents

Chronicle introduces a method called cut‑point replay to make regression testing of large language model (LLM) agents reproducible. It records an agent’s run at non‑deterministic boundaries as immutable envelopes and then replays selected boundaries while executing the rest live, enabling continuous‑integration tests that detect faulty code changes. Benchmarks show minimal overhead, perfect bit‑stability, and effective detection of unsafe actions in a mutation study.

By Tisha Chawla, Susheem Koul