arXiv AI By Mehmet Caner, Agostino Capponi, Nathan Sun, Jonathan Y. Tan

Designing Agentic AI-Based Screening for Portfolio Investment

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2603. 23300v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce a new agentic artificial intelligence (AI) platform for portfolio management.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 12

FrontierFinance: A Challenging Benchmark for Measuring Frontier Intelligence of Finance Agents

AI agents are increasingly deployed for professional investment research, yet no benchmark captures the complexity of the full investor workflow. Existing benchmarks mainly target financial data extraction, a narrow slice that current models have largely saturated, while reference-based metrics and generic LLM-as-a-judge scoring fall short on the open-ended, long-form answers that real analyst queries demand.

arXiv AI
Aug 20

FinSkillBench: Evaluating AI Agents and Domain Skills for Investment Management

FinSkillBench is an evaluation suite that tests whether language model agents can use financial domain skills to solve investment management tasks across portfolio construction, risk management, and fundamental analysis. The benchmark contains 12 subtasks with 2,603 episodes, each providing point‑in‑time inputs, hidden ground truth, and a verifier. Experiments show that curated skill packages improve performance significantly, while self‑generated skills offer little benefit, indicating that reliable procedural skills are crucial for effective AI agents in this domain.

By Jermyn Zhen Yong Bek, Zhuang Qiang Bok, Zhongtian Sun
arXiv AI
Sep 23

The Self Driving Portfolio: Agentic Architecture for Institutional Asset Management

The paper introduces an agentic strategic asset allocation pipeline called the Self Driving Portfolio, where 44 specialized agents generate market assumptions, 21 competing methods construct portfolios, and agents critique and vote on each other's outputs. A researcher agent can propose new construction methods, while a meta agent evaluates past forecasts against realized returns and rewrites agent code and prompts to enhance future performance. The entire process is governed by an Investment Policy Statement, mirroring the document that guides human portfolio managers, thereby constraining and directing autonomous agents.

By Andrew Ang, Nazym Azimbayev, Andrey Kim