Large language models are increasingly evaluated by other models, raising a natural question: can a model predict how a judge will score its own output? We find that the ability is largely present before any targeted training: prompted few-shot, a base model already predicts an external judge's multi-attribute quality scores on open-ended responses well above chance across three benchmarks.
arXiv:2607. 28076v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is effective for training large language model agents.
By Binbin Zheng, Zijun Xie, Guanqun Zhao, Enlei Gong, Xing Ma, Xiaoliang Fu, Zeyu Chen
arXiv:2507.21931v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce plausible but poorly-calibrated answers, limiting their reliability on reasoning-intensive tasks....
By Carel van Niekerk, Renato Vukovic, Benjamin Ruppik, Hsien-chin Lin, Shutong Feng, Milica Ga\v{s}i\'c
arXiv:2606.05122v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large language models are increasingly evaluated by other models, raising a natural question: can a model predict how a judge will score its own ou...
By XiuYu Zhang, Yi Shan, Junfeng Fang, Zhenkai Liang
arXiv:2608. 03223v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning enables LLM agents to learn through interaction, but sparse trajectory-level rewards reveal success without identifying which intermediate decisions deserve credit.
By Ranxu Zhang, Guinan Chen, Chenshaodong, Jinghao Lin, Xiaozhou Xu, Sunzhe, Yanyong Zhang, Chao Wang
arXiv:2606. 16774v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Equipping Large Language Model (LLM) agents with effective skills is crucial for solving complex tasks in real-world systems like OpenClaw.
By Tianyi Lin, Chuanyu Sun, Jingyi Zhang, Changxu Wei, Huanjin Yao, Shunyu Liu, Xikun Zhang, Liu Liu, Jiaxing Huang