arXiv Machine Learning By Kyoungho Cho, Yu-Seong Jeon, Jinhyoung Lee, Jeongho Bang

Breaking the One-Dimensional Expressibility-Trainability Tradeoff

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 04598v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Expressive parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) are often designed under a dilemma: the growth of expressibility and entangling power (EP) that improves Hilbert-space coverage is also expected to randomize an ansatz and activate barren-plateau (BP) conditions.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 24

Quantum Adaptive Self-Attention for Quantum Transformer Models

arXiv:2504. 05336v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A recurring weakness in quantum machine learning (QML) is that reported ``quantum advantages'' are seldom tested against a \emph{capacity-matched} classical control, leaving it unclear whether a gain comes from the quantum substrate or from the architectural change that accompanies it.

By Chi-Sheng Chen, En-Jui Kuo
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

Dynamic Entanglement-Weighted Pruning for Quantum Federated Unlearning in Supply-Chain Risk Prediction

The paper proposes Entanglement-Weighted Pruning (EWP), a method for unlearning a client’s contribution from a federated quantum classifier without retraining from scratch. EWP scores each trainable circuit parameter by combining a Fisher‑information estimate on the target client’s data with a structural entanglement weight, pruning the lowest‑scoring parameters and optionally fine‑tuning the remaining ones. Experiments on a four‑qubit data‑re‑uploading ansatz trained with FedAvg across five simulated supply‑chain‑risk clients show that EWP achieves accuracy comparable to full retraining while reducing forgetting and wall‑clock time by about sixteenfold, outperforming random, Fisher‑only, or entanglement‑only pruning.

By Aditya Kumar, Sumit Chongder