arXiv:2607. 26472v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio deepfake detectors often degrade when generators, corpora, or recording conditions change.
By Haotian Mo, Jie Liu, Siqi Shen, Songzhu Mei, Xinhai Chen, Xiangyang Wang, Yigui Feng, Shuai Li, Gencheng Liu, Keqi Yang, Qinglin Wang
arXiv:2511. 21325v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deepfake (DF) audio detectors still struggle to generalize to out of distribution inputs.
By Ido Nitzan Hidekel, Gal lifshitz, Khen Cohen, Dan Raviv
arXiv:2606. 10223v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Attributing a synthetic utterance to its originating system remains an open challenge: closed-set models fail to reject unseen synthesizers and produce overconfident predictions.
By Awais Khan, Kutub Uddin, Khalid Malik
arXiv:2607. 28351v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speech deepfake detection has expanded in scope with increasingly heterogeneous spoofing mechanisms, including speech synthesis, voice conversion, vocoder reconstruction, and neural-codec resynthesis.
By Wan Lin, Li Wang, Jindong Wang, Kunyu Feng, Zhizheng Wu
arXiv:2508. 07048v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Autoregressive (AR) encoder-decoder models dominate high-quality multilingual ASR, but their left-to-right decoders make inference latency scale with transcript length.
By Taeyoun Kwon, Junhyuk Ahn, Taegeun Yun, Heeju Jwa, Yoonchae Choi, Siwon Park, Jongchan Kim, Hyungon Ryu, Hyuk-Jae Lee, Nam-Joon Kim
arXiv:2607. 09891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Audio deepfake detection models determine whether speech is genuine or artificially generated, but high overall accuracy can mask substantial performance disparities across demographic groups.
By Aishwarya R. Fursule, Vamshi Nallaguntla, Shruti Kshirsagar, Anderson R. Avila