Hugging Face Trending Papers

Adversarial Attacks for Good: A Survey of Proactive Protection across the Visual Content Lifecycle

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Once visual content enters an AI pipeline, its owner often retains little technical control over how it is used. Legal and regulatory remedies can address misuse, but many technical interventions must be applied earlier, when content is released or accessed.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

IP Protection in the Era of Visual Generative AI: A Survey

arXiv:2608. 14730v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid evolution of visual generative AI has introduced a wide range of intellectual property risks, spanning the unauthorized learning, reproduction, extraction, misuse, and redistribution of protected data and model assets.

By Zhuan Shi, Shunchang Liu, Alireza Dehghanpour Farashah, Qian Yang, Han Yu, Cao Yang, Chaochao Chen, Yuping Yan, Yaochu Jin, Golnoosh Farnadi, Lingjuan Lyu
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Catch-Only-One: Non-Transferable Examples for Model-Specific Authorization

arXiv:2510. 10982v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent AI regulations increasingly emphasize the need for mechanisms that preserve the utility of data for AI innovation while preventing misuse, particularly by enforcing purpose limitation in downstream AI applications.

By Zihan Wang, Zhiyong Ma, Zhongkui Ma, Shuofeng Liu, Akide Liu, Derui Wang, Minhui Xue, Guangdong Bai