arXiv AI By Cuong Vuong Tuan, Trang Mai Xuan, Tien-Cuong Nguyen, Vu-Duc Ngo, Thien Van Luong

A Training-Free Mixture-of-Agents Framework for Multi-Document Summarization using LLMs and Knowledge Graphs

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 03867v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-Document Summarization (MDS) plays a critical role in distilling essential information from collections of textual data.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

CARPAS: Towards Content-Aware Refinement of Provided Aspects for Summarization in Large Language Models

The paper introduces CARPAS, a new task that dynamically refines user-provided aspects for aspect-based summarization in large language models (LLMs). It presents three new datasets and evaluates four prompting strategies, finding that LLMs tend to over-generate aspects, leading to overly long and misaligned summaries. To address this, the authors propose a two-stage framework that first generates lightweight scope guidance before aspect refinement and summarization, which improves focus, reduces over-generation, and enhances performance across all datasets.

By Yong-En Tian, Yu-Chien Tang, An-Zi Yen, Wen-Chih Peng
arXiv AI
Aug 24

PSK at WMT 2026 MIST: Task-Specialized QLoRA Adapters for Multilingual Summarization and Question Answering

The PSK submission to the WMT 2026 Multilingual Instruction Shared Task employs a 3.35B‑parameter Tiny Aya Global model enhanced with three QLoRA adapters, each dedicated to a specific task: multilingual summarization, passage‑based question answering, and filtered standalone question answering. The summarization adapter is trained on multilingual document‑summary pairs, including scientific papers with author‑written abstracts, and outperforms a multitask adapter trained solely on organizer data on a held‑out split. For open question answering, results vary with answer length and evaluation method, prompting the submission of three systems that share the same context and summarization adapters but differ in their open‑QA adapters.

By Srikar Kashyap Pulipaka