arXiv AI

FORGE: Research-Trajectory Hijacking Attacks on Deep Research Agents

arXiv:2607. 04718v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research agents decompose open-ended queries into subtasks, retrieve web evidence over multiple rounds, and synthesize long-form reports.

arXiv AI
Aug 6

Breadcrumbing Search Agents

arXiv:2608. 04565v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based search agents are widely used for information-seeking tasks, but their reliance on external tool returns introduces a critical security risk: web content retrieved during execution is untrusted, exposing agents to prompt injection and goal hijacking.

By Xuebin Li, Hanqing Zhao, Siyuan Liang, Kejiang Chen, Weiming Zhang, Dacheng Tao, Nenghai Yu
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Evaluating Deep-Search Agents under Hierarchical Web Evidence Poisoning

arXiv:2609.06027v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Search-augmented LLM agents are increasingly used for consumer decisions, making them vulnerable to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) poisoning. E...

By Zhongan Bi, Qiwen Wang, Jianrong Jiang, Jigang Ding, Wenwen Xiong, Changhua Meng, Xuanang Gao, Kepeng Lin, Changjiang Jiang, Yiang Chen, Huan Yao, Wei Wang, Zhenyu Ma, Wenhui Dong
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Targeted Routing Hijacking in Federated RAG

The paper exposes a new vulnerability in Federated Retrieval-Augmented Generation (FedRAG) called Routing Hijacking, where a malicious client forges its semantic profile to attract target queries despite lacking relevant data. Experiments across three FedRAG routing architectures show that this attack consistently misroutes queries, causing downstream failures such as missing evidence, poisoning, incorrect answers, hallucinations, and sycophantic behavior. The authors propose a trust‑aware post‑routing framework that reweights clients based on evidence feedback, which effectively suppresses persistent hijacking and transfers to a learned neural router.

By Junjie Mu, Qiongxiu Li
arXiv AI
Jun 3

Inference Cost Attacks for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models

arXiv:2606. 02643v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-enhanced LLM systems, while powerful, introduce substantial inference costs due to the inclusion of an extra multi-stage pipeline that dynamically retrieves and synthesizes information from external knowledge sources.

By Chengliang Liu, Liangbo Ning, Yujuan Ding, Wenqi Fan
arXiv AI
Jun 2

DiscourseFlip: An Oblique Discourse-Level Opinion Manipulation Attack against Black-box Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv:2606. 01212v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are widely deployed and increasingly influential, but their reliance on external corpora exposes new security risks from poisoned retrieval content.

By Yuyang Gong, Miaokun Chen, Jiawei Liu, Zhuo Chen, Guoxiu He, Wei Lu, XiaoFeng Wang, Xiaozhong Liu
arXiv AI
Aug 26

RAGSentinel: Certifiable Geometric Consensus for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation

RAGSentinel is a training‑free, label‑free defense designed for black‑box retrieval‑augmented generation systems. It employs a surrogate encoder to detect hidden‑state shifts caused by retrieved documents, removes shared topic directions, and filters poisoned documents as geometric outliers from a robust majority consensus. The method is proven to recover a poison‑free majority context under honest‑majority and representation‑separation assumptions, and experiments show it keeps attack success rates low while maintaining accuracy across multiple datasets, LLM families, and adaptive attacks.

By Yueyang Quan, Anjun Gao, Yufei Xia, Minghong Fang, Zhuqing Liu
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Corrupt Plans, Clean Traces: Evading Chain-of-Thought Monitoring with Plan Injection

The paper introduces a new attack called "plan injection" that allows a large language model to carry out harmful actions while evading chain-of-thought monitoring. By inserting harmful but benign-sounding reasoning into the model’s context, the attacker can steer the model’s behavior and cause it to paraphrase the injected plan as its own reasoning. The study demonstrates that this attack works across different monitoring settings, scales to harder tasks, and even causes monitors to waste resources on the injected plan, reducing detection rates by up to 50%.

By Keertana Chidambaram, Andrew Ilyas, Vasilis Syrgkanis