arXiv AI

Knowdit: Agentic Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection with Auditing Knowledge Summarization

arXiv:2603. 26270v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Smart contracts govern billions of dollars in decentralized finance (DeFi), yet automated vulnerability detection remains challenging because many vulnerabilities are tightly coupled with project-specific business logic.

arXiv AI

Jun 18

Code-Augur: Agentic Vulnerability Detection via Specification Inference

arXiv:2606. 18619v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The advent of agentic vulnerability detection is already becoming a watershed moment for software security.

By Zhengxiong Luo, Mehtab Zafar, Dylan Wolff, Abhik Roychoudhury

llms agents benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 3

Decoupled Smart Contract Audits: Lightweight LLM Framework via Distillation and Aggregation

arXiv:2606. 03128v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Smart contracts face critical security challenges that require thorough auditing in decentralized web services.

By Bagus Rakadyanto Oktavianto Putra, Muhamad Risqi Utama Saputra, Widyawan, Guntur Dharma Putra

llms efficiency benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jun 26

CyberChainBench: Can AI Agents Secure Smart Contracts Against Real-World On-Chain Vulnerabilities?

arXiv:2606. 26216v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present CyberChainBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLM-based agents on smart contract security across three complementary tasks: vulnerability detection, exploit generation, and patch synthesis.

By Jintao Huang, Fengqing Jiang, Radha Poovendran, Zhiqiang Lin

llms agents benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 14

Agent Hacks Agent: Autoresearch for Production-Agent Red-Teaming

arXiv:2607. 11698v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Production LLM agents such as Claude Code and Codex operate over untrusted content, files, commands, and workspace state, making safety failures directly actionable.

By Xutao Mao, Xiang Zheng, Cong Wang

llms agents benchmarks safety

Hugging Face Trending Papers

Jul 13

Agent Hacks Agent: Autoresearch for Production-Agent Red-Teaming

Production LLM agents such as Claude Code and Codex operate over untrusted content, files, commands, and workspace state, making safety failures directly actionable. Red-teaming must therefore keep pace with evolving models and tools.

llms agents benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Aug 5

AgenticSCR: An Autonomous Agentic Secure Code Review for Immature Vulnerabilities Detection

arXiv:2601. 19138v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Secure code review is critical during pre-integration, where Atlassian developers rely on lightweight analysis tools, while deep security assessment is deferred to later stages, delaying feedback and increasing remediation costs.

By Wachiraphan Charoenwet, Kla Tantithamthavorn, Patanamon Thongtanunam, Hong Yi Lin, Minwoo Jeong, Ming Wu

llms agents

arXiv AI

Jun 15

SEVRA-BENCH: Social Engineering of Vulnerabilities in Review Agents

arXiv:2606. 13757v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) reviewers are increasingly used in pull-request (PR) workflows, where their approvals help decide which code is merged into a repository.

By Rui Melo, Riccardo Fogliato, Sean Zhou, Pratiksha Thaker, Zhiwei Steven Wu

llms agents benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jul 10

From Legacy Documentation to OSCAL: An MCP-Based Agent Pipeline for Threat-Informed Continuous Compliance in Critical Infrastructure

arXiv:2607. 08288v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In critical infrastructure, operational technology environments often cannot be actively scanned, and yet active system feedback is needed for risk assessment and compliance.

By Lea Roxanne Muth, Marian Margraf

llms agents safety

arXiv AI

Jun 29

DMind Benchmark: Toward a Holistic Assessment of LLM Capabilities across the Web3 Domain

arXiv:2504. 16116v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Web3 ecosystem, underpinned by cryptographic primitives and decentralized consensus, represents a high-stakes environment where software vulnerabilities and incentive misalignments translate directly into financial loss.

By Enhao Huang, Pengyu Sun, Shuxun Wang, Zixin Lin, Alex Chen, Kaichun Hu, Joey Ouyang, Frank Li, Zhiyu Zhang, Haobo Wang, Yiming Li, Zhan Qin, James Yi, Gang Zhao, Ziang Ling, Lowes Yang

llms benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jul 1

FLARE-AI: Flaw Reporting for AI

arXiv:2606. 31567v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flaw reporting for deployed AI systems is fundamental to identifying system failures and improving AI safety.

By Shayne Longpre, Elaine Zhu, Carson Ezell, Avijit Ghosh, Sean McGregor, Kevin Paeth, Kevin Klyman, Sayash Kapoor, Rishi Bommasani, Ruth Appel, Gregory Strom, Lauren McIlvenny, Mark M. Jaycox, Peter Slattery, Nathan Butters, Arvind Narayanan, Percy Liang, Alex Pentland

safety

arXiv AI

Jun 8

RAVEN: Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network for Memory Corruption Analysis in User Code and Binary Programs

arXiv:2604. 17948v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various cybersecurity tasks, including vulnerability classification, detection, and patching.

By Parteek Jamwal, Minghao Shao, Boyuan Chen, Achyuta Muthuvelan, Asini Subanya, Boubacar Ballo, Kashish Satija, Mariam Shafey, Mohamed Mahmoud, Moncif Dahaji Bouffi, Pasindu Wickramasinghe, Siyona Goel, Yaakulya Sabbani, Hakim Hacid, Mthandazo Ndhlovu, Eleanna Kafeza, Sanjay Rawat, Muhammad Shafique

llms rag agents safety

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 18

OpenAnt: LLM-Powered Vulnerability Discovery Through Code Decomposition, Adversarial Verification, and Dynamic Testing

arXiv:2606. 19149v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated vulnerability discovery in large codebases remains challenging: traditional static analysis produces high false-positive rates, while dynamic approaches such as fuzzing require substantial infrastructure and often target narrow classes of bugs.

By Nahum Korda, Gadi Evron

llms safety

Related stories