arXiv:2609.39340v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Electrolyte formulation design requires balancing multiple physicochemical properties, yet existing models often focus on a limited subset. Learning ea...
By Jiaxin Yu, Shuo Wang, Peng Wang, Yongcai Wang, Deying Li
The paper presents a hierarchical deep‑learning framework that integrates compositional, structural, and transport models to screen solid‑state electrolytes. Four modules—L‑G‑DCNN, DenseGNN, MatterSim, and DeePMD—coordinate to evaluate thermodynamics, multi‑property performance, and kinetic transport, outperforming existing methods. Applied to over 30 million candidates, the workflow identifies 97 high‑performance materials, mainly halides, and links Li⁺ jump‑network connectivity to ionic conductivity while highlighting limits for oxide electrolytes.
By Hongwei Du, Dingyang Lv, Baole Wei, Yongheng Li, Feng Yu, Ziheng Lu, Siqi Shi, Hong Wang
arXiv:2606. 28220v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful tool for solving nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs), including battery electrochemical models.
By Gift Modekwe, Qiugang Lu
arXiv:2607. 25597v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The reactivity of lithium-metal electrolytes arises from the interplay of molecular functional groups, Li$^+$ solvation, and salt-anion participation.
By Mingkang Liu, Huize Yu, Yanbin Gao, Nan Yao, Xiang Chen, Lei Shen
arXiv:2606. 15001v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have enabled atomistic simulations across broad regions of chemical and materials space, but many remain computationally expensive and lack explicit electrostatics, limiting their use for systems governed by long-range interactions and electrical response.
By Xiaoyu Wang, Bingqing Cheng
arXiv:2606. 18691v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pre-trained materials foundation models, or machine learning interatomic potentials, leverage general physicochemical knowledge to effectively approximate potential energy surfaces.
By Youngwoo Cho, Seunghoon Yi, Wooil Yang, Sungmo Kang, Young-woo Son, Jaegul Choo, Joonseok Lee, Soo Kyung Kim, Hongkee Yoon
arXiv:2609.37941v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: This study provides a data-driven analysis of a novel dataset of single-cell Anion Exchange Membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWE), operated under consta...
By Marco Veneriano, Ani Gjergji, Sebastiano Bellani, Andrea Riva, Vito Paolo Pastore, Matteo Santacesaria
arXiv:2606. 00821v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This study addresses the challenge of controlling a complex, multi-parameter technological process -- pectin hydrolysis--extraction -- using machine learning methods.
By Mullosharaf K. Arabov, Shavkat Yo. Kholov, Zainiddin K. Muhiddin
The paper introduces EMolStudio, a density‑matrix‑centered AI platform that predicts and analyzes electronic structure for electrolyte molecules in lithium batteries. It integrates molecular functionalization, explicit Li⁺ first‑shell assembly, density‑matrix prediction, and electronic‑structure parsing, enabling systematic study of 163,655 functionalized molecules and 22,500 first‑shell clusters across four lithium salts. The analysis reveals that functional groups and anion identity distinctly influence frontier orbital energies, electrostatic potential, and Li⁺‑donor contacts, with LiTDI anchoring the highest occupied orbital on the anion.
By Mingkang Liu, Huize Yu, Lei Shen
arXiv:2607. 10887v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLPs) have revolutionized atomistic modeling, offering the potential to replace traditional methods like Density Functional Theory (DFT).
By Jan Eckwert, Julija Zavadlav
arXiv:2606. 24983v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Implicit solvent machine learning potentials (MLPs) offer a powerful route to bridging the gap between accuracy and efficiency in molecular simulations.
By Linying Zhang, Julija Zavadlav
ProtoMI is a literature‑driven framework that learns structural priors from 126 reported boron‑containing electrolyte additives and applies them to screen 179,977 unlabeled candidates. Using graph contrastive learning, it identifies seven interpretable prototypes and adapts them through semi‑supervised contrastive learning, achieving enrichment factors of 9.2–45.6 while evaluating less than 2% of the candidate space. The method led to the discovery of four commercially accessible additives, including TNDB, which improves high‑temperature LiFePO4||graphite cycling by 34.93% and forms protective interphases that suppress solvent decomposition and Fe deposition.
By Weixiang Hong, Hongting Du, Jiayue Tang, Ruifeng Tan, Yangjian Quan, Jia Li, Jiaqiang Huang