arXiv:2609. 30477v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Exact Euclidean \(K\)-means partitions \(n\) observations into \(K\) unlabelled clusters, but the unrestricted search is generally exponential.
By Yordan P. Raykov, Max A. Little
arXiv:2411. 12438v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We develop a new approach for clustering non-spherical (i.
By Prashanti Anderson, Mitali Bafna, Rares-Darius Buhai, Pravesh K. Kothari, David Steurer
The paper formalizes a geometric tradeoff between ambient separation and sampling gaps to determine when distinct manifold components can be reliably separated in clustering. It introduces a threshold phenomenon for mutual‑k‑nearest‑neighbor graphs, defining an uncertainty zone where the number of clusters cannot be identified. The authors propose Manifold‑Based Clustering (MBC), which outputs a bracket interval quantifying this uncertainty rather than forcing a single cluster count.
By Savik Kinger, Luciano Dyballa, Steven W. Zucker
arXiv:2502. 08397v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Clustering is a fundamental technique in data analysis and machine learning, used to group similar data points together.
By Anna Livia Croella, Veronica Piccialli, Antonio M. Sudoso
arXiv:2607. 09490v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Terminal embeddings have emerged as a powerful tool for dimension reduction.
By Alexander Munteanu, Matteo Russo, David Saulpic, Chris Schwiegelshohn
The paper introduces the Universal Clustering Problem (UCP), a framework that captures the optimisation core common to many clustering methods by maximizing a polynomial‑time computable partition utility over a finite metric space. It proves UCP is NP‑hard through reductions from graph colouring and exact cover by 3‑sets, showing that popular algorithms such as k‑means, GMMs, DBSCAN, spectral clustering, and affinity propagation inherit this intractability. The authors argue that this unified hardness explains typical failure modes—like local optima and greedy merge traps—and suggest moving toward stability‑aware objectives and interaction‑driven formulations with explicit guarantees.
By Angshul Majumdar
arXiv:2607. 24237v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many existing clustering methods are designed based on a set-oriented definition---a cluster is a set of similar points---relying a point-to-point similarity function to find similar points.
By Kai Ming Ting, Kaifeng Zhang, Sanjay Chawla
arXiv:2602. 08542v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Given a weighted undirected graph, a number of clusters $k$, and an exponent $z$, the goal in the $(k, z)$-clustering problem on graphs is to select $k$ vertices as centers that minimize the sum of the distances raised to the power $z$ of each vertex to its closest center.
By Emilio Cruciani, Sebastian Forster, Antonis Skarlatos
arXiv:2609.06394v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Massive datasets in modern machine learning have made data reduction a central challenge, particularly for clustering tasks where memory and computat...
By Diptarka Chakraborty, Satyaki Mukherjee, Gaurav Vallabhdas Revankar, Hoang-Son Tran
arXiv:2606. 29261v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We derive the linear union-of-subspaces (UoS) model for subspace clustering (SC) from the nonlinear mixture model (NMM) used in blind source separation (BSS) to represent a D-dimensional observation vector as an unknown multivariate nonlinear mapping of C latent variables.
By Ivica Kopriva
arXiv:2607. 24537v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In the Big Data era, the scalability of clustering algorithms constitutes a key challenge.
By Filip Kosiorowski, Grzegorz Sroka
arXiv:2609.36762v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Federated clustering methods that do not require the global number of clusters $K$ still assume that each client knows its local number $K_g$. This ass...
By Mitushi Goyal, Tarun S., Riddhanya Senapathi, Arun Raman