arXiv:2607. 28894v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computational cognitive modeling seeks to infer latent cognitive mechanisms underlying observed behavior.
arXiv:2607. 03426v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning and world-knowledge capabilities, yet often struggle to gather information effectively across the multi-turn interactions required in sequential decision-making settings.
arXiv:2606. 01182v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at static reasoning tasks, yet their performance often degrades in interactive scenarios where information must be actively acquired through questioning.
arXiv:2607. 16927v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce Deep Adaptive Bayesian Screening (DABS), a method for performing adaptive factorial screening in high-dimensional discrete design spaces.
arXiv:2512. 22999v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider problems of parameter estimation where design variables can be actively optimized to maximize information gain.
arXiv:2502. 08004v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Simulation-based inference (SBI) is a method to perform inference on a variety of complex scientific models with challenging inference (inverse) problems.
The paper tackles two shortcomings of Gaussian‑process based active learning: (1) the posterior variance is independent of observed values, reducing sensitivity to data structure, and (2) it over‑inflates variance near domain boundaries, causing excessive edge sampling. The authors propose a reconstruction‑driven design density that warps sampling toward regions where the posterior mean changes rapidly, and a geometric equalizer that corrects boundary bias. Experiments on sixteen synthetic and two real‑data benchmarks show that the equalizer consistently improves function reconstruction, while the warp further enhances performance by concentrating measurements where the target function varies most.
arXiv:2608. 09696v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predicting the answer to interventional ``what if'' questions --- the outcome of an action never taken --- requires a \emph{mechanistic}, causal model, not a curve fit; and learning such a model requires \emph{experiments}, because passive data leaves its mechanisms unidentified.
arXiv:2608.16466v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Bayesian optimal experimental design (BOED) aims to collect informative data by optimizing an expected utility reflecting the goals of an exp...
BayesPrompt proposes a Bayesian approach to prompt optimisation for large language models, aiming to generate prompts that are both efficient in perplexity and human readable. The authors argue that traditional optimisation methods produce unintelligible pseudoprompts due to the ill‑posed nature of the task. Their algorithm samples prompts from a posterior distribution, and experiments on real data show marked improvements over state‑of‑the‑art alternatives across several metrics.
arXiv:2606. 30335v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous scientific discovery systems increasingly use large language models (LLMs) to propose new hypotheses, but many such systems condition primarily on experimental memory: archives of high-scoring candidates or heuristic summaries of recent trials.
arXiv:2609.26021v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dynamic black-box optimization presents significant challenges for Bayesian Optimization (BO), as the objective function evolves over time, causing opt...
Predicting the answer to interventional ``what if'' questions --- the outcome of an action never taken --- requires a \emph{mechanistic}, causal model, not a curve fit; and learning such a model requires \emph{experiments}, because passive data leaves its mechanisms unidentified. Experiments are expensive, so the central problem is \emph{data efficiency}.