Auto-Formalizing Neuro-Symbolic Predictors
arXiv:2610.01519v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) predictors incorporate prior knowledge into the prediction process of neural networks, ensuring that outputs satisfy specified...
arXiv:2503. 18509v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Weak supervision enables machine learning models to learn from limited or noisy labels, but it introduces challenges in reliability and semantic clarity, particularly in multi-instance partial label learning (MI-PLL), where models must resolve both ambiguous supervision signals and uncertain instance-label mappings.
arXiv:2610.01519v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) predictors incorporate prior knowledge into the prediction process of neural networks, ensuring that outputs satisfy specified...
arXiv:2605. 26171v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many practical anomalies are not merely rare inputs, but violations of semantic constraints: objects co-occur in structured ways, actions imply preconditions, and events satisfy temporal or relational regularities.
arXiv:2605. 04193v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) aims to learn interpretable first-order rules from data, but existing symbolic and neuro-symbolic approaches struggle to scale to noisy and probabilistic settings.
arXiv:2601. 22642v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable capabilities, yet their stochastic next-token prediction creates logical inconsistencies and reward hacking that formal symbolic systems avoid.
Deep learning has achieved great success in recent years thanks to the availability of high-quality, well-annotated training data. However, this requirement is often not met in real-world applications.
arXiv:2608. 06896v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep learning has achieved great success in recent years thanks to the availability of high-quality, well-annotated training data.
arXiv:2608. 10843v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: First-order concept synthesis asks a system to infer one formula that classifies labeled objects consistently across several finite relational structures.
The paper introduces a neuro‑symbolic framework for scientific reasoning that separates symbolic validity and semantic groundedness. A deterministic symbolic verifier acts as a hard filter to guarantee syntactic and arithmetic correctness, while a Process Reward Model (PRM) is trained on verifier‑accepted steps to assess contextual grounding. The authors propose Counterfactual Symbolic Perturbation (CSP) to generate hard negative examples that pass the verifier but are logically flawed, enabling efficient PRM training and a verifier‑first constrained search at inference.
arXiv:2607. 01585v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predicate invention (PI), the creation of new predicates to extend the hypothesis space, remains a critical bottleneck in Inductive Logic Programming (ILP).
arXiv:2607. 15776v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: OWL ontologies provide a formal knowledge representation framework that enables semantic reasoning, and have been widely adopted across domains such as healthcare and bioinformatics.
arXiv:2510. 23379v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We investigate a relatively under-explored class of hybrid neurosymbolic models that integrate symbolic learning with neural reasoning to construct data generators meeting formal correctness criteria.
arXiv:2609.13520v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large Language Models have improved rapidly, many fundamental questions remain about how to evaluate the knowledge and reasoning abilities they a...