arXiv Machine Learning

Local Clustering on Complex Graphs and Complex Hypergraphs

arXiv:2412. 03008v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Local/seeded clustering aims to find a compact cluster near the given starting instances.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 3

Incremental (k, z)-Clustering on Graphs

arXiv:2602. 08542v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Given a weighted undirected graph, a number of clusters $k$, and an exponent $z$, the goal in the $(k, z)$-clustering problem on graphs is to select $k$ vertices as centers that minimize the sum of the distances raised to the power $z$ of each vertex to its closest center.

By Emilio Cruciani, Sebastian Forster, Antonis Skarlatos
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 14

Hierarchical $\mathcal{F}$-Clustering: Approximation and Hardness of Clustering into Trees and Bounded Diameter Graphs

Consider the following variation on the Hierarchical Clustering problem: Usually, while building a hierarchical clustering, one recursively partitions the data until each cluster becomes a singleton. We relax the halting condition of the recursive process to stop whenever the remaining cluster is a graph belonging to a class $\mathcal{F}$.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Selective Hypergraph Refinement for Frozen Graph Clustering

The paper introduces Selective Hypergraph Refinement (SHR), a post‑processing technique for frozen graph clustering models that does not alter model parameters, node representations, or the original graph. SHR uses an attribute hypergraph to generate candidate refinement directions and selectively updates only nodes with sufficient support, preserving the majority of original assignments. Experiments on 15 backbone‑dataset combinations show modest macro gains (up to 0.137 pp) with very few hard assignment changes, indicating a limited but measurable refinement space after training.

By Zimo Si
arXiv AI
Sep 17

Universal NP-Hardness of Clustering under General Utilities

The paper introduces the Universal Clustering Problem (UCP), a framework that captures the optimisation core common to many clustering methods by maximizing a polynomial‑time computable partition utility over a finite metric space. It proves UCP is NP‑hard through reductions from graph colouring and exact cover by 3‑sets, showing that popular algorithms such as k‑means, GMMs, DBSCAN, spectral clustering, and affinity propagation inherit this intractability. The authors argue that this unified hardness explains typical failure modes—like local optima and greedy merge traps—and suggest moving toward stability‑aware objectives and interaction‑driven formulations with explicit guarantees.

By Angshul Majumdar
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 13

Scalable Varied-Density Clustering via Graph Propagation

arXiv:2508. 02989v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a novel perspective on varied-density clustering for high-dimensional data by framing it as a label propagation process in neighborhood graphs that adapt to local density variations.

By Ninh Pham, Yingtao Zheng, Hugo Phibbs