Hugging Face Trending Papers

Agentic Method for Deterministic Validation of Legacy Code Migration

Migration of legacy COBOL programs to Java requires extensive testing to ensure correct functionality. This effort is often complicated by the lack of test data and the difficulty of validating all corner cases.

arXiv AI
Aug 10

Agentic Planning for Symbolic Execution

arXiv:2608. 06397v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Symbolic execution seeks to explore feasible program paths, yet a practical run may exhaust its resources while much program behaviour remains unreached.

By Daniel Koh Ji Yang, Yannic Noller, Corina S. Pasareanu, Youcheng Sun
arXiv AI
Jun 9

SecureVibeBench: Benchmarking Secure Vibe Coding of AI Agents via Reconstructing Vulnerability-Introducing Scenarios

arXiv:2509. 22097v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language model-powered code agents are rapidly transforming software engineering, yet the security risks of their generated code have become a critical concern.

By Junkai Chen, Huihui Huang, Yunbo Lyu, Junwen An, Jieke Shi, Chengran Yang, Ting Zhang, Haoye Tian, Yikun Li, Zhenhao Li, Xin Zhou, Xing Hu, David Lo
arXiv AI
Jul 29

Specula: Scaling formal specifications for autonomous model checking of system code

arXiv:2607. 25333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Specula is a push-button agentic system that generates high-quality formal specifications for large, complex system code and uses the specifications for highly effective model checking and bug finding.

By Qian Cheng, Saad Mohammad Rafid Pial, Ruize Tang, Yiming Su, Emilie Ma, Finn Hackett, Ivan Beschastnikh, Yu Huang, Tianyin Xu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
2d ago

TDD-Agent: Test-Driven Reasoning for Code Generation

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in code generation, yet ensuring correctness in complex, repository-level tasks remains challenging. Existing approaches often use generated tests as static post-hoc validators, which limits their ability to guide implementation and may introduce misleading feedback when the tests themselves are incomplete or incorrect.