arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 19
AgentArmor: A Framework, Evaluation, \& Mitigation of Coding Agent Failures
arXiv:2606. 19380v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Software engineering and deployment are increasingly being delegated to AI coding agents.
ClayBuddy: A Framework, Evaluation, & Mitigation of Coding Agent Failures
arXiv:2606. 19380v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Software engineering and deployment are increasingly delegated to AI coding agents.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 29
Distributing Security Controls Through Harness Engineering
arXiv:2607. 25890v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI coding agents are being adopted at historic speed, yet security and risk concerns remain the primary barrier to scaling agentic AI across organizations.
arXiv AI
Aug 3
Tool Specifications Matter: Uncovering and Mitigating Safety Risks in AI Agents
arXiv:2607. 29254v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents extend large language models (LLMs) with external tools, enabling them to perform complex tasks and translate model outputs into consequential real-world actions.
arXiv AI
Jul 16
AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities
arXiv:2607. 13705v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents, the need for unified evaluation infrastructure becomes critical.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 28
Distributing Security Controls Through Harness Engineering
AI coding agents are being adopted at historic speed, yet security and risk concerns remain the primary barrier to scaling agentic AI across organizations. Existing security controls for coding agents are not systematically distributed to engineering teams, and vendor-native solutions introduce ecosystem dependencies that may not suit every deployment context.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 15
AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities
As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents, the need for unified evaluation infrastructure becomes critical. However, current evaluation pipelines remain highly fragmented and tightly coupled, hindering reproducibility and causing redundant engineering.
arXiv AI
Aug 5
Designing for Doubt: The Case for Informed Abstention in Autonomous Agents
arXiv:2606. 02965v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As large language models gain tool access and are deployed as autonomous agents capable of editing records, executing transactions, and modifying infrastructure, we still evaluate them based on the sole metric of task completion.
arXiv AI
Jun 11
Engineering Robustness into Personal Agents with the AI Workflow Store
arXiv:2605. 10907v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The dominant paradigm for AI agents is an "on-the-fly" loop in which agents synthesize plans and execute actions within seconds or minutes in response to user prompts.
arXiv AI
Jul 7
Refused in Chat, Written in Code: Workflow-Level Jailbreak Construction in IDE Coding Agents
arXiv:2607. 03968v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly deployed as IDE-integrated coding agents that decompose tasks, generate and edit files, run code, and refine outputs over many turns.
arXiv AI
Jul 28
Execution-Grounded Security Testing for Coding Agents in Software Engineering Pipelines
arXiv:2607. 22569v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Coding agents are increasingly integrated into system operations, where their tool use can directly modify project artifacts, execution environments, and the underlying system.
arXiv AI
Jul 22
Data Leakage Prevention in Agentic Applications via Preemptive Hardening
arXiv:2607. 18847v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic systems integrate LLM driven planning with interfaces to external tools, making data leakage and tool misuse feasible via instruction/data boundary failures and prompt injection attacks.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30
REAP: Automatic Curation of Coding Agent Benchmarks from Interactive Production Usage
arXiv:2604. 01527v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Production deployment of AI coding agents requires fast, reproducible evaluation signals.