arXiv:2606. 19220v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine Unlearning (MU) has emerged as an important technique for removing specific data points from trained models without requiring full retraining.
Machine Unlearning (MU) has emerged as an important technique for removing specific data points from trained models without requiring full retraining. However, most existing MU research focuses on deep learning and image data, leaving a gap in the domain of network intrusion detection, which relies heavily on tabular data.
arXiv:2609.36039v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have dominated Intrusion Detection System (IDS) research in recent years. Unfortunately, many existing s...
arXiv:2606. 31594v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Internet of Things (IoT) is rapidly growing and expanding into various sectors, such as healthcare, transportation, smart homes, and more.
The paper investigates whether machine learning models for IoT intrusion detection truly learn attack patterns or rely on dataset shortcuts. Using the CyberFlowIoT-GICAP benchmark, the authors evaluate four learning paradigms across different feature sets and split strategies, finding that performance is largely driven by feature representation and that tree-based models can exploit temporal artifacts. The study also highlights asymmetric attack detectability and proposes a four-point protocol checklist for realistic evaluation.
The study compares XGBoost and RoBERTa‑LoRA for network intrusion detection across three evaluation axes: same‑dataset performance, cross‑dataset transfer, and adversarial evasion. Both models perform similarly on the same dataset, but XGBoost outperforms RoBERTa‑LoRA by 15 F1 points and 25 balanced accuracy points when transferred to a different network, while RoBERTa‑LoRA wins by about 17 F1 points under adversarial evasion. Feature‑leakage ablation shows that cross‑dataset transfer improvements are non‑monotonic and directional, suggesting leakage is spread across features rather than isolated. "whyItMatters":"The findings demonstrate that a model’s superiority depends on the specific robustness axis evaluated, underscoring the need for multi‑axis, multi‑metric testing in network intrusion detection research."
arXiv:2607. 00553v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Lightweight machine learning models are increasingly proposed for intrusion detection in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) networks due to their suitability for resource-constrained edge deployment.
arXiv:2606. 01442v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Network intrusion detection is a core component of modern cybersecurity infrastructure, yet the deep learning models that dominate the field are computationally demanding, motivating interest in lightweight alternatives suited to edge and neuromorphic deployment.
arXiv:2608. 10349v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine-learning intrusion-detection studies commonly emphasize predictive accuracy while treating explanation generation as a computationally free post-processing step.
arXiv:2607. 02981v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advancements in the Internet of Things (IoT) emphasize the urgent need for advanced network security, as IoT networks feature dynamic topologies, imbalanced traffic, and complex attack patterns.
arXiv:2512. 22179v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Detecting previously unseen attacks remains a major challenge for machine learning-based intrusion detection systems.
arXiv:2608. 02274v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Electric Vehicle Charging Systems (EVCSs) are increasingly connected with Internet of Things (IoT) devices, which improves charging intelligence but also expands their exposure to cyber-attacks.
arXiv:2606. 00134v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) in Internet of Things (IoT) environments face significant challenges due to data heterogeneity, lack of labeled data, and limited model interpretability.