arXiv AI

REFORGE: A Method for Benchmarking LLMs' Reverse Engineering Capabilities in Decompiled Binary Function Naming

arXiv:2607. 07738v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to reverse-engineering tasks, and recent threat-intelligence reporting shows them operating inside live offensive-security workflows.

arXiv AI
Aug 10

Beyond Text Matching: Towards Reference-Free Evaluation for Human-Oriented Binary Reverse Engineering

arXiv:2608. 07038v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human-Oriented Binary Reverse Engineering (HOBRE) aims to transform decompiled pseudocode into a more human-friendly representation, thereby reducing the cognitive burden of reverse analysis and improving efficiency.

By Xiuwei Shang, Li Hu, Xiao Jiang, Jieke Shi, Junda He, Zhou Yang, Shaoyin Cheng, Guoqiang Chen, Weiming Zhang, David Lo
arXiv AI
Aug 13

The Next Challenge for Agentic Cybersecurity: A Realistic, Contamination-Free Reverse Engineering Benchmark

arXiv:2608. 11469v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI agents are rapidly improving in cybersecurity capabilities when the source code is available for analysis, yet much of the software most consequential to cybersecurity, including malware, firmware, and proprietary applications, is available only as binaries.

By Jeremy Spence, Nicholas Assaderaghi, Jinhao Zhu, Nikil Ravi, Raluca Ada Popa, Guannan Wei, Yangruibo Ding, Zhuo Zhang
arXiv AI
Jul 28

Compiler-Grounded Hierarchical Diagnosis for LLM-Based Triton Kernel Optimization

arXiv:2607. 23089v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled automated kernel generation and optimization, but most existing approaches rely on surface signals such as compilation feedback and profiling metrics.

By Dongjie Chen, Ping Zhao, Bohua Zhan, Yulong Wang, Shushu Chen, Liangjun Feng, Hao Zhou, Min Shen, Linmu Wang, Weijia Sheng, Xiangyu Wei, Weijie Ding, Jianhui Huang, Yaoqing Gao
arXiv AI
Jun 16

DualGauge: Automated Joint Security-Functionality Benchmarking of Specification-Only Code Generation by LLMs and Coding Agents

arXiv:2511. 20709v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based coding agents are now used to generate code from natural-language specifications, yet ensuring such code is both functionally correct and secure remains a challenge.

By Rupam Patir, Keyan Guo, Suvadra Barua, Abhijeet Pathak, Dinesh Gudimetla, Jiawei Guo, Hongxin Hu, Haipeng Cai
arXiv AI
2d ago

T-LLM Compiler: Trusted LLM-based Code Optimization and Verification Framework

arXiv:2608. 14953v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened opportunities to apply high-level code transformations to the field of code optimization, and it has since emerged as one of the most fundamental tasks for LLMs to perform; however, at present, LLMs struggle to apply wide-ranging code optimization tasks due to both the complexity of the code and the inability to independently verify the correctness of the transformations.

By Zahra Fazel, Sunanda Gamage, Shayan Shirahmad Gale Bagi, Amir H. Ashouri, Tomasz S. Czajkowski, Bryan Chan, Reza Azimi, Yaoqing Gao
arXiv AI
2d ago

ReLoop: Structured Modeling and Behavioral Verification for Reliable LLM-Based Optimization

arXiv:2602. 15983v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can translate natural language into optimization code, but silent failures pose a critical risk: code that executes and returns solver-feasible solutions may encode semantically incorrect formulations---a feasibility--correctness gap reaching 90 percentage points on compositional problems.

By Junbo Jacob Lian, Yujun Sun, Huiling Chen, Chaoyu Zhang, Hanzhang Qin, Chung-Piaw Teo