arXiv AI

OPERA: Online Data Pruning for Efficient Retrieval Model Adaptation

arXiv:2603. 17205v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Domain-specific finetuning is essential for dense retrievers, yet not all data pairs contribute equally to the learning process.

arXiv AI
Aug 18

Static Pruning Across Sparse Retrieval Regimes: What Transfers, What Breaks, and What Still Helps

arXiv:2608. 16309v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Static pruning is widely used to accelerate sparse neural retrieval, yet existing studies each validate their conclusions within a single custom pipeline, leaving it unclear which findings transfer to modern engines with different index organizations and dynamic pruning mechanisms.

By Zirui Song, Yuye Zhu, Yang Yang
arXiv AI
Aug 19

DEPT: Document Embedding Preservation Tuning for Unified Query Expansion and Retrieval

The paper introduces DEPT, a method that trains a single decoder-only large language model to both expand queries and encode documents for retrieval. By preserving document embeddings close to their initial cached values while allowing gradients to flow through the generator, DEPT stabilizes retrieval targets and enables efficient index reuse and online hard‑negative mining. Experiments on the BEIR benchmark with Qwen3‑4B‑Instruct‑2507 and LLaMA‑3.2‑3B‑Instruct show that DEPT outperforms training‑free, independently trained, and staged unified baselines, with ablations confirming the benefits of preservation, whitening, end‑to‑end expansion training, and online negatives.

By Jingyuan Wang, Richong Zhang, Zhijie Nie, Mingxin Li, Yanzhao Zhang
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Align Then Adapt: Label-Efficient Adapter Learning for Asymmetric Dense Retrieval

The paper introduces Efficient Retrieval Adapter (ERA), a query‑side adapter framework that enables dense retrieval systems to adapt to asymmetric query–document scenarios without re‑indexing. ERA first aligns the embedding spaces of a powerful query embedder and a lightweight document embedder using unlabeled documents, then fine‑tunes the aligned query representation with a small set of labeled query‑document pairs. In experiments on 126 MAIR retrieval tasks across six domains, ERA boosts average nDCG@10 by up to 8.2 points in symmetric settings and over 12 points in asymmetric settings while requiring far fewer labels than fully supervised adapter training.

By Seiji Maekawa, Moin Aminnaseri, Pouya Pezeshkpour, Estevam Hruschka
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 30

Diagnosing and Mitigating Retrieval Bottlenecks in LLM-Based Cold-Start Recommendation

arXiv:2606. 29947v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as rerankers in recommender systems, with the expectation that semantic understanding will help in cold-start and long-tail regimes.

By Zhe Dong (University of Maine at Presque Isle), Fang Qin (Stanford University), Manish Shah (Independent Researcher), Yicheng Wang (Independent Researcher)
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Less can be More: Relieving RAG Bottlenecks via Evidence Frontloading and Pressure-Adaptive Budgeting

The paper introduces “PACE”, a training‑free framework that tackles bottlenecks in Retrieval‑Augmented Generation by frontloading evidence and adaptively budgeting reranking. It first reorders candidate documents based on marginal evidence coverage—prioritizing query‑relevant, complementary, and chain‑forming documents—providing a $(1-1/e)$ approximation guarantee. Then it dynamically adjusts the reranking budget according to the relative pressure of the reranker and the language model, improving evidence recall and reducing p95 latency in multi‑hop QA workloads.

By Weibin Cai, Reza Zafarani
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Select, Don't Train: The Benefits of Modular Entity Disambiguation with LLM-Based Selection

The paper investigates modular entity disambiguation by separating candidate retrieval from entity selection. It compares sparse retrieval (BM25), Web KB search, and a dense retriever, all paired with large language model selectors. Results show that a training‑free BM25 retriever combined with an LLM selector achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on the ZELDA benchmark, and the modular approach enables abstention when retrieval fails.

By Fina Polat, Daniel Daza, Pengyu Zhang, Klim Zaporojets, Paul Groth